--- On Mon, 3/9/09, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mkrufky/sms1xxx-gpio
To: Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org, Uri Shkolnik uri...@yahoo.com
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Uri Shkolnik wrote:
--- On Mon, 3/9/09, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mkrufky/sms1xxx-gpio
To: Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org, Uri Shkolnik uri...@yahoo.com
Cc: linux-media
--- On Wed, 3/11/09, Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org wrote:
From: Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mkrufky/sms1xxx-gpio
To: Uri Shkolnik uri...@yahoo.com
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Date
--- On Wed, 3/11/09, Uri Shkolnik uri...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Uri Shkolnik uri...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mkrufky/sms1xxx-gpio
To: Devin Heitmueller devin.heitmuel...@gmail.com
Cc: Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
in kernel. That means that we shouldn't add a changeset that we know that it
will break a device, except if we are committing, in the same patch series,
another patch fixing it.
I wouldn't even do that. If you know the patch has a problem with
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:58:55 -0400
Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org wrote:
Uri Shkolnik wrote:
--- On Fri, 3/6/09, Michael Krufky mkru...@linuxtv.org wrote:
snip/
I reviewed your tree , which is indicated by the email above, and compared
it to a tree I built from the v4l 'trunk'
