Hi to all,
with latest git, w_scan partially working only if adding -t2 or t3.
It seems that scan quality of w_scan is lower if compared to dvb_app scan
# w_scan -f t -t2 -x it-Venice-w
# w_scan -f t -t2 -I it-Venice-w stdout
wc -l stdout
73
# w_scan -f t -t3 stdout
130 it-Venice-w.stdout
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Eddi De Pieri e...@depieri.net wrote:
Hi to all,
with latest git, w_scan partially working only if adding -t2 or t3.
It seems that scan quality of w_scan is lower if compared to dvb_app scan
Hi Eddi,
A really useful test would be to run the exact same scan
Hi Mauro,
drxk driver seems to have 2 issue with w_scan:
- dvb-t tune error while scanning (solved by forcing w_scan to open
dvb-t fe without autoscan)
- dvb-t scan fail
so... we should have an issue that when the driver release dvb-c
adapter drxk (or xc5000?) stay in dvb-c mode
Can you check
On 08-12-2011 22:45, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
Hi Mauro...
I applied your patch... the patch seems good using scan, but still
some issue with w_scan:
tune to:
17750:INVERSION_AUTO:BANDWIDTH_7_MHZ:FEC_2_3:FEC_AUTO:QAM_64:TRANSMISSION_MODE_8K:GUARD_INTERVAL_1_32:HIERARCHY_NONE
0x 0x0d49:
On 09-12-2011 07:35, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
Hi Mauro,
drxk driver seems to have 2 issue with w_scan:
- dvb-t tune error while scanning (solved by forcing w_scan to open
dvb-t fe without autoscan)
- dvb-t scan fail
so... we should have an issue that when the driver release dvb-c
adapter drxk (or
On 09-12-2011 08:46, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 09-12-2011 07:35, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
Hi Mauro,
drxk driver seems to have 2 issue with w_scan:
- dvb-t tune error while scanning (solved by forcing w_scan to open
dvb-t fe without autoscan)
- dvb-t scan fail
so... we should have an issue
On 08-12-2011 07:10, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
I test again HVR930C without the patch for XC5000 that added
regression to other tuners.
Attached the results using scan (ubuntu)
Actually HVR-930C seems one of the usb dvb-t tuner I own with best sensitivity.
using w_scan:
root@depieri1lnx:~# w_scan
On 12/08/11 11:12, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Scanning 7MHz frequencies...
177500: (time: 00:00)
184500: (time: 00:03)
[...]
834000: (time: 02:46) (time: 02:48)
842000: (time: 02:50)
85: (time: 02:52) (time: 02:55)
858000: (time: 02:56)
On 08-12-2011 12:00, Fredrik Lingvall wrote:
On 12/08/11 11:12, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Scanning 7MHz frequencies...
177500: (time: 00:00)
184500: (time: 00:03)
[...]
834000: (time: 02:46) (time: 02:48)
842000: (time: 02:50)
85: (time:
Hi Mauro...
I applied your patch... the patch seems good using scan, but still
some issue with w_scan:
tune to:
17750:INVERSION_AUTO:BANDWIDTH_7_MHZ:FEC_2_3:FEC_AUTO:QAM_64:TRANSMISSION_MODE_8K:GUARD_INTERVAL_1_32:HIERARCHY_NONE
0x 0x0d49: pmt_pid 0x0102 RAI -- Rai 1 (running)
0x
10 matches
Mail list logo