Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-04-15 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 02:41:05 Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hello Theodore kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Also, after the byte indicator for the compression algorithm there are some more bytes, and these almost definitely contain information which could be valuable while doing image

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-04-16 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:22:11 Theodore Kilgore wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote: On Wednesday 04 March 2009 02:41:05 Thomas Kaiser wrote: Hello Theodore kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Also, after the byte indicator for the compression algorithm there are some

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-04-17 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Friday 17 April 2009 12:50:51 Theodore Kilgore wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote: On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:22:11 Theodore Kilgore wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote: I've been looking through the frame headers sent by the MR97310A (the Aiptek PenCam VGA+, 08ca

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add Mars-Semi MR97310A format

2009-01-15 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Thursday 15 January 2009 05:49:46 Jean-Francois Moine wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:59:34 -0600 Kyle Guinn ely...@gmail.com wrote: Add a pixel format for the Mars-Semi MR97310A webcam controller. The MR97310A is a dual-mode webcam controller that provides compressed BGGR Bayer frames

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] gspca: Add MR97310A driver

2009-01-16 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Friday 16 January 2009 02:47:31 Jean-Francois Moine wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:36:49 -0600 Kyle Guinn ely...@gmail.com wrote: This patch adds support for USB webcams based on the MR97310A chip. It was tested with an Aiptek PenCam VGA+ webcam. Hi Kyle, I added your driver to my

Re: MR97310A and other image formats

2009-02-17 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 13:09:28 Jean-Francois Moine wrote: Hi Kyle, Looking at the v4l library from Hans de Goede, I did not find the decoding of the MR97310A images. May you send him a patch for that? Yes, I sent this to him some time ago. Take a look here:

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-03-03 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 18:12:33 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Hans, Jean-Francois, and Kyle, The proposed patches are not very long, so I will give each of them, with my comments after each, to explain why I believe that these changes are a good idea. First, the patch to

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-03-04 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 02:39:11 Hans de Goede wrote: Which also makes me wonder about the same change for the mr97310a, is that cam already supported in a released kernel ? If not we MUST make sure we get this change in before 2.6.29 final, if it is I'm afraid we cannot make these

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-03-04 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 22:34:13 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote: On Tuesday 03 March 2009 18:12:33 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: contents of file mr97310a.patch follow, for gspca/mr97310a.c

Re: RFC on proposed patches to mr97310a.c for gspca and v4l

2009-03-05 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Thursday 05 March 2009 14:58:54 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Well, here is the code in the function. I don't see. So can you explain? Perhaps I am dense. { struct sd *sd = (struct sd *) gspca_dev; int i; /* Search for the SOF marker (fixed part) in

Re: [PATCH] for the file gspca/mr97310a.c

2009-03-05 Thread Kyle Guinn
On Thursday 05 March 2009 20:34:27 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Signed-off-by: Theodore Kilgore kilg...@auburn.edu -- --- mr97310a.c.old2009-02-23 23:59:07.0 -0600 +++ mr97310a.c2009-03-05