On Sun, 17 May 2009 16:55:54 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 of May 2009 at 21:45:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
> > binding model. I've split it into 8 pieces for easier review. Firstly
> > there is 1 preliminary patc
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:25:02 +0200, Oldřich Jedlička wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 of May 2009 at 21:45:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
> > > binding model. I've split it in
On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:25:02 +0200, Oldřich Jedlička wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 of May 2009 at 21:45:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
> > binding model. I've split it into 8 pieces for easier review. Firstly
> > there is 1
On Wednesday 13 of May 2009 at 21:45:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
> binding model. I've split it into 8 pieces for easier review. Firstly
> there is 1 preliminary patch:
>
Hi Jean,
works for me, as usual :-) I've used the
Hi all,
Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
binding model. I've split it into 8 pieces for easier review. Firstly
there is 1 preliminary patch:
01-ir-kbd-i2c-dont-abuse-client-name.patch
Then 3 patches doing the actual conversion:
02-ir-kbd-i2c-convert-to-new-styl