RE: [PATCH - v0 2/2] DaVinci - vpfe capture - Make clocks configurable

2009-12-08 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
Cc: davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com Subject: RE: [PATCH - v0 2/2] DaVinci - vpfe capture - Make clocks configurable I was talking to Sekhar about this and actually he made some good points about this implementation. If we consider specific IP, then the required clocks would

RE: [PATCH - v0 2/2] DaVinci - vpfe capture - Make clocks configurable

2009-12-08 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Vaibhav, I have posted a re-worked patch with clocks configuration moved to ccdc. From your response below, I understand the clocks are being called differently on different SoCs even though they use the same IP. So IMO, it is better to customize it on a SoC by defining the clock names in the

RE: [PATCH - v0 2/2] DaVinci - vpfe capture - Make clocks configurable

2009-12-04 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Vaibhav, Could you confirm my question below? I need to submit a patch on Monday. Currently we have vpfe_capture.c file (master/bridge driver) which is handling clk_get/put, and platform data is providing the details about it. Ideally we should handle it in respective ccdc driver file, since he

RE: [PATCH - v0 2/2] DaVinci - vpfe capture - Make clocks configurable

2009-12-03 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
I was talking to Sekhar about this and actually he made some good points about this implementation. If we consider specific IP, then the required clocks would remain always be the same. There might be some devices which may not be using some clocks (so as that specific feature). Actually we are

RE: [PATCH - v0 2/2] DaVinci - vpfe capture - Make clocks configurable

2009-12-02 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
-Original Message- From: Karicheri, Muralidharan Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:49 PM To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; hverk...@xs4all.nl; khil...@deeprootsystems.com Cc: davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; Hiremath, Vaibhav; Karicheri, Muralidharan Subject: