Re: difference mchehab/new_build.git to media_build.git ?

2011-01-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 09-01-2011 02:01, Vincent McIntyre escreveu: >> There's no difference. It started out at mchehab/new_build.git, then got >> moved >> to media_build.git, but there's a symlink in place to keep from breaking >> things >> for people who originally checked it out at the old location. >> >> The move

Re: difference mchehab/new_build.git to media_build.git ?

2011-01-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 09-01-2011 16:23, CityK escreveu: > vincent.mcintyre wrote: >> Thanks for clarifying this. Doesn't this justify a one-line NEWS item? >> I can understand not wanting to mention it while still experimental, but >> now... > > Last night (well, actually the wee wee hours of this morning), I took

Re: difference mchehab/new_build.git to media_build.git ?

2011-01-09 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday, January 09, 2011 19:23:01 CityK wrote: > vincent.mcintyre wrote: > > Thanks for clarifying this. Doesn't this justify a one-line NEWS item? > > I can understand not wanting to mention it while still experimental, but > > now... > > Last night (well, actually the wee wee hours of this m

Re: difference mchehab/new_build.git to media_build.git ?

2011-01-09 Thread CityK
vincent.mcintyre wrote: Thanks for clarifying this. Doesn't this justify a one-line NEWS item? I can understand not wanting to mention it while still experimental, but now... Last night (well, actually the wee wee hours of this morning), I took the time to: - add a news announcement regarding

Re: difference mchehab/new_build.git to media_build.git ?

2011-01-08 Thread Vincent McIntyre
> There's no difference. It started out at mchehab/new_build.git, then got > moved > to media_build.git, but there's a symlink in place to keep from breaking > things > for people who originally checked it out at the old location. > > The move essentially promoted it from "something Mauro's tinkeri

Re: difference mchehab/new_build.git to media_build.git ?

2011-01-08 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Jan 8, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Martin Dauskardt wrote: > Since some months I didn't test any new drivers, because I don't want to run > an unstable kernel. The v4l-dvb hg is obviously dead, although I never read a > formally announcement. Requests remain unanswered > (http://article.gmane.org/gm