Em Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:54:38 +0100
Sean Young escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:23:00AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:14:06 +0100
> > > Sean Young escreveu:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:23:00AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:14:06 +0100
> > Sean Young escreveu:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:41:57AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> -snip-
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:23:00AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:14:06 +0100
> Sean Young escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:41:57AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
-snip-
> > > -#define LIRC_SET_REC_DUTY_CYCLE_IOW('i', 0x0016,
Em Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:14:06 +0100
Sean Young escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:41:57AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > While reviewing the documentation gaps on LIRC, it was
> > noticed that several ioctls aren't used by any LIRC drivers
> > (nor at staging or
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:41:57AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> While reviewing the documentation gaps on LIRC, it was
> noticed that several ioctls aren't used by any LIRC drivers
> (nor at staging or mainstream).
>
> It doesn't make sense to document them, as they're not used
>
While reviewing the documentation gaps on LIRC, it was
noticed that several ioctls aren't used by any LIRC drivers
(nor at staging or mainstream).
It doesn't make sense to document them, as they're not used
anywhere. So, let's remove those from the lirc header.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho