On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Hello Mike,
Mike Isely wrote:
Mauro:
FYI, I posted an Acked-By: Mike Isely is...@pobox.com weeks ago, back on
27-May, immediately after the patch was posted. It's a great catch, and the
bug has been there since basically the beginning of the driver. Was I ever
supposed to see any kind of reaction to that ack (e.g. having the Acked-By
added to the patch)? I had posted it in reply to the original patch, copied
back to the patch author, to lkml, to linux-media, kernel-janitors, and
Mauro.
-Mike
It seems my mistake since I have added CC instead of Acked-by, sorry.
This happened because usually I add CC to the authors of drivers when I took
patches from patchwork and I wanna notify them. In your case, I missed the
acked-by.
Mauro, if possible, could you please replace CC to the correct Acked-by before
submit this patch to Linus?
Hmm, going through my old e-mail now I can see that the patch was picked
up for -mm on 1-Jun. At that time I was marked as a CC: for the patch -
which I'd expect as the driver maintainer. But no Acked-By: was
showing. Maybe that's when the ack got missed.
Obviously I have no issue with this patch. My only real concern is that
nobody thinks I might have been ignoring it. Thanks for following up.
-Mike
--
Mike Isely
isely @ isely (dot) net
PGP: 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
