Hello,
On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:26 AM Edward Hervey wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:50 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> [...]
> >
> > I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force
> > systems with rather small amount of memory (like 256M) to use highmem
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:50 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
[...]
>
> I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force
> systems with rather small amount of memory (like 256M) to use highmem just
> to support DMA allocable memory. It also doesn't solve the issue with
On Monday 28 February 2011 11:21:52 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:11:47 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 February 2011 13:12:42 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 25, 2011 18:22:51 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
> > > > > What *n
On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:11:47 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011 13:12:42 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Friday, February 25, 2011 18:22:51 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
> > > > What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at
the
>
On Sunday 27 February 2011 20:49:37 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011, Edward Hervey wrote:
> > > Are there any gstreamer/linaro/etc core developers attending the ELC in
> > > San Francisco in April? I think it might be useful to get together
> > > before, during or after the conf
On Sunday, February 27, 2011 20:49:37 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011, Edward Hervey wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any gstreamer/linaro/etc core developers attending the ELC in
San Francisco
> > > in April? I think it might be useful to get together before, during or
after the
On Saturday 26 February 2011 13:12:42 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, February 25, 2011 18:22:51 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
> > > What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
> > >
> > > kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use an
Hello,
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 8:20 PM Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> > > 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
> > >
> > >> What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
>
On Saturday 26 February 2011, Edward Hervey wrote:
> >
> > Are there any gstreamer/linaro/etc core developers attending the ELC in San
> > Francisco
> > in April? I think it might be useful to get together before, during or
> > after the
> > conference and see if we can turn this discussion in s
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
> >
> >> What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
> >> kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that
> >> userspace
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 14:47 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Saturday, February 26, 2011 14:38:50 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> > >> > Perhaps GStreamer experts would like to comment on the future plans
> > >> > ahead
> > >> > for zero c
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
>
>> What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
>> kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that
>> userspace (like GStreamer) can pass around, monitor and know about.
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 14:38:50 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> >> > Perhaps GStreamer experts would like to comment on the future plans ahead
> >> > for zero copying/IPC and low power HW use cases? Could Gstreamer adapt
> >> > some id
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>> > Perhaps GStreamer experts would like to comment on the future plans ahead
>> > for zero copying/IPC and low power HW use cases? Could Gstreamer adapt
>> > some ideas from OMX IL making OMX IL obsolete?
>>
>> perhaps OMX should adapt som
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote:
>> 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
>>
>> > The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
>> > attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> To make a long story short:
> Different vendors provide custom OpenMax solutions for say Camera/ISP. In
> the Linux eco-system there is V4L2 doing much of this work already and is
> evolving with mediacontroller as well. Then there is th
On Friday, February 25, 2011 18:22:51 Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
>
> > What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
> > kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that
> > userspace (like GStreamer) can pass around, monitor and kno
2011/2/24 Edward Hervey :
> What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
> kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that
> userspace (like GStreamer) can pass around, monitor and know about.
I think the patches sent out from ST-Ericsson's Johan Mossb
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> There are two parts to this: first of all you need a way to allocate large
> buffers. The CMA patch series is available (but not yet merged) that does
> this.
> I'm not sure of the latest status of this series.
>
> The other part is that ever
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Edward Hervey wrote:
>
> What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the
> kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that
> userspace (like GStreamer) can pass around, monitor and know about.
yes yes yes yes!!
vaapi/vdpa
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thursday 24 February 2011 14:04:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote:
>> > 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
>> > > The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
>> > > a
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:19 +0100, Edward Hervey wrote:
>
> Will GStreamer be as cpu/memory efficient as a pure OMX solution ?
> No,
> I seriously doubt we'll break down all the fundamental notions in
> GStreamer to make it use 0 cpu when running some processing.
I blame late night mails...
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 17:39 +0100, Robert Fekete wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty
> of inviting both linux-media@vger.kernel.org and
> gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. For any newcomer I really
> recommend to do some catch-up readin
Hi,
On Thursday 24 February 2011 15:48:20 Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > In order to expand this knowled
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
>> > inviting both linux-media
On Thursday 24 February 2011 14:17:12 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty
> > > of inviting both linux-
On Tuesday 22 February 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete wrote:
> > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
> > inviting both linux-media@vger.kernel.org and
> > gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. For any newcomer
On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:44:19 Clark, Rob wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
> > inviting both linux-media@vger.kernel.org and
> > gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org.
On Thursday 24 February 2011 14:04:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
> > > The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
> > > attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP f
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
>
> > The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
> > attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP for
> > graphics/audio processing in case the camera use case is
2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta :
> The imaging coprocessor in today's platforms have a general purpose DSP
> attached to it I have seen some work being done to use this DSP for
> graphics/audio processing in case the camera use case is not being tried or
> also if the camera usecases does not consume the
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of
> inviting both linux-media@vger.kernel.org and
> gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. For any newcomer I really recommend
> to do some catch-up reading on
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
