On 07/30/2012 12:21 AM, poma wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:43 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/13/2012 12:07 AM, Steven Toth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Steven Toth st...@kernellabs.com
wrote:
Nobody understands the relationship between the bridge and the
sub-component as well as the
On 07/20/2012 03:43 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 07/13/2012 12:07 AM, Steven Toth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Steven Toth st...@kernellabs.com
wrote:
Nobody understands the relationship between the bridge and the
sub-component as well as the bridge driver. The current interfaces
On 07/13/2012 04:16 PM, Steven Toth wrote:
There is set_property() and get_property() callbacks defined for FE already.
But those are not used. My opinion is that those callbacks should be changed
to deliver data for demodulator and for tuner too instead of current method
- which is common huge
There is set_property() and get_property() callbacks defined for FE already.
But those are not used. My opinion is that those callbacks should be changed
to deliver data for demodulator and for tuner too instead of current method
- which is common huge properties cache structure shared between
Resend in plaintext, it got bounced from vger.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Steven Toth st...@kernellabs.com wrote:
Is there anyone who could say straight now what is best approach and
where to look example?
I don't have an answer but the topic does interest me. :)
Nobody understands
On 07/13/2012 12:07 AM, Steven Toth wrote:
Resend in plaintext, it got bounced from vger.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Steven Toth st...@kernellabs.com wrote:
Is there anyone who could say straight now what is best approach and
where to look example?
I don't have an answer but the
