On Sunday 22 February 2009 02:15:51 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
Oldest supported Ubuntu kernel is 2.6.22 (7.10):
This is a bit optimistic.
Matter of fact, I just bought a brand new eeePC in January, on which Asus
chose to install Xandros. The response to uname -r is (I put this on
On Sunday 22 February 2009 00:47:46 Adam Baker wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
The high rate of changes and new drivers means that keeping up the
backwards compatibility becomes an increasingly heavy burden.
This leads to two questions:
1) Can we change our
Hi Trent,
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:58:10 -0800 (PST), Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
Well, that's basically what Hans has been doing with
v4l2-i2c-drv-legacy.h for months now, isn't it? This is the easy part
(even though even this wasn't exactly trivial...)
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
your standpoint. It doesn't matter
Hi,
When I try to push changes to my tree I get these errors:
pushing to ssh://hverk...@linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng-ctrls
searching for changes
remote: ** unknown exception encountered, details follow
remote: ** report bug details to http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts
remote: ** or
Hi together,
following this dicussion for some time, let me just add my solely
personal view. I'll have to prepend that I'm only a user in terms of
v4l-dvb, but do for instance quite a lot support for Eee PC netbooks. So
some comments here in some sense urged me to jump into this discussion.
Hi, thanks for your support Antti !
Hello and thank you for information,
According to your previous post, you are correct. I did one of the most
typical mistake when adding new usb-id:s :) (didn't increase
.num_device_descs).
Laurent Haond wrote:
af9015_usb_probe: interface:0
Since dvb-api doc is still outdated by six years...
The following patch changes dvbapi.pdf as following:
___
- change from twosided book format to singlesided book format.
* By doing so, the readability is improved
Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Hi Mauro,
Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~dougsland/v4l-dvb/ for the
following:
- v4l2-apps: Add parser for USB snoops captured from SniffUSB 2.0
It is not clear to me why this ended up in /v4l2-apps/test, as opposed
to /v4l2/util -- can
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy.
Same here :)
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:30:52 Adam Baker wrote:
(linux-omap included in distribution as lots of omap systems include
cameras so this could be
Hans Verkuil wrote:
It took me several long weekends to get all this work done, but I think it's
been very worthwhile.
Kudos! Well done -- another positive change!
Together these cards use the ... ks0127 i2c devices
quick question(s) - is this what I think it is -- a remote
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:32:08 -0500, CityK wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
It took me several long weekends to get all this work done, but I think
it's
been very worthwhile.
Kudos! Well done -- another positive change!
I cant only second this. Yay!
Together these cards use the
Hans Verkuil wrote:
Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
Yes
Optional question:
Why:
Its causing skilled developers to waste time that would be better served
in other areas. Because of that, these skilled volunteers are becoming
frustrated and
(This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.)
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Sun Feb 22 19:00:03 CET 2009
path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb
changeset: 10653:359d95e1d541
gcc version:
Hi there!
MFE patches added a variable id to struct dvb_frontend.
This variable seems to be uninitialized for some drivers.
The result is for my skystar2 card (using stv0299 frontend) it sometimes is 0
as it should but sometimes it is a random value, so I get this register
message:
DVB:
David Engel wrote:
I'll start with what worked.
... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ...
Steven Toth wrote:
I think CityK confirmed that the nxt2004 driver statistics are
probably bogus so I doubt you're going to get your 115's running with
BER 0 regardless,
Any work in progress for CAM support on the 2033?
Currently using, http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/s2-liplianin but
I´ll switch to whatever has or will have CAM.
Card info,
25.180805] Mantis :00:07.0: PCI INT A - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18
[ 25.180843] Mantis :00:07.0: setting
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
snip
Hans and Adam,
I am not sure how it fits into the above discussion, but perhaps it is
relevant to point out that flags can be toggled. Here is what I mean:
Suppose that we have two flags 01 and 10
sonof...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Mon Feb 16 22:51 , sonof...@iinet.net.au sent:
I have done alot more testing and have found that it seems to be only after
mythtv has accessed the device where this problem beings begins...
Same result with the hg version updated tonight.
I
I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the
queue :(
http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/
I'm wondering it the quotations in the subject line are enough to throw
the script off. Mauro, any ideas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Btw. I also had a longer look at the firmeware page in wiki and removed that
note about gentoo using hotplug-scripts as that is false since a long time.
CityK you are right, I think most (if not all) current distributions use udev
to create device nodes and upload
Jonathan Isom wrote:
Hi
I was looking over my logs and I'm wondering is
nxt200x: Timeout waiting for nxt2004 to init
common
No its not common
or is this womething I need to worry about. I got one shortly before a
lockup(No backtrace). Nothing was doing other than dvbstreamer sitting
Stephen Rowles wrote:
Only sending this to linux-dvb as I'm not signed up to the media list, and
I'll probably get myself blacklisted from any future help by saying this
;) but...
BANISHMENT for Rowles !!!
Just kidding. Thanks for the insightful reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
panagiotis takis_rs wrote:
panagiotis takis_rs wrote:
Hey!!
I have a problem with my tv card(pinnacle pctv 310i)
I can see image but i have no sound.
I have tried both tvtime and kdetv.
I have found this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=568528
. Is it related with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jean-Francois,
Please pull from my repository. It includes one critical fix which
needs to go in 2.6.29.
Best regards,
Erik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Riba Zoltán wrote:
Hi,
I want to get working this card under my Debian
:(2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 on i686)
http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.php/Image:4ch_DVR_card.jpg
But it doesn't want...:
dmesg:
bttv: driver version 0.9.17 loaded
bttv: using 8 buffers with 2080k (520 pages) each
Amy Overmyer wrote:
Lastly, are there any other IC components on the back or front of the
PCB ? Can you provide pics (upload them to the wiki article)) ?
The back only has a couple components, probably for electrical, no ICs.
okay
The
front only has the cypress (100 pin pkg) chip
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
snip
Hans and Adam,
I am not sure how it fits into the above discussion, but perhaps it
is relevant to point out that flags can be toggled. Here is what I mean:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Tobias Stöber wrote:
Hi together,
following this dicussion for some time, let me just add my solely personal
view. I'll have to prepend that I'm only a user in terms of v4l-dvb, but do
for instance quite a lot support for Eee PC netbooks. So some comments here
in some
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
(usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
about are in a struct which communicates information one way, from the camera
to userspace, so there is
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
(usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we are talking
about are in a struct which
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity
switch (usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also the bits we
are talking about are in a struct
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
MFE patches added a variable id to struct dvb_frontend.
This variable seems to be uninitialized for some drivers.
The result is for my skystar2 card (using stv0299 frontend) it sometimes is 0
as it should but sometimes it is a random value, so I get
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 14:12 -0500, CityK wrote:
The V4L-DVB is lacking in strategic direction. Yesterday was the time
to adopt one; so lets pick up one today!
CityK,
I see you've been reading (or channeling) my blathering:
http://www.linuxtv.org/irc/v4l/index.php?date=2009-02-20
([19:42]
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity
switch (usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope). Also
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch
(usually nothing as advanced as a gyroscope).
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional
Dear Guennadi
Currently soc-camera doesn't set up any image format without an explicit
S_FMT.
It seems this should be supported, since, for example, capture-example.c from
v4l2-apps by default doesn't issue an S_FMT. This patch configures a default
image format on open().
(snip)
Ok,
Yes...
On Mon Feb 23 12:13 , hermann pitton sent:
Am Sonntag, den 22.02.2009, 11:15 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:04:13 -0500
CityK ci...@rogers.com wrote:
I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the
queue :(
http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/
I'm wondering it the quotations in the subject line are enough to throw
the script off.
Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 14:12 -0500, CityK wrote:
The V4L-DVB is lacking in strategic direction. Yesterday was the time
to adopt one; so lets pick up one today!
CityK,
I see you've been reading (or channeling) my blathering:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:04:13 -0500 CityK ci...@rogers.com wrote:
I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the
queue :(
http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/
I'm wondering it the quotations in the subject line are enough
Dear Guennadi.
Now MigoR and AP325 board have ov772x camera.
However, the lens used is different.
And I have a specific good setting value
for the lens of AP325.
So, I would like to add new function for
specific lens value.
meybe like this.
Can I add it ?
-- board-ap325 ---
static
2009/2/22 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl:
Hi all,
There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
determine someone's opinion.
So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short
46 matches
Mail list logo
