--jim
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, jegunn wrote:
Thanks. I tried this a little while before I got your reply; the
performance is *very* sensitive to the setting; 3 is more-or-less
OK, but better with zero. I was using 1 before with 1.0.2.1. Did
the priority code change between these versions
# $_X_background_pause = (off)
in .dosemurc. So the memory size is recognized, but the vesamode line is
not. Has the syntax changed? The documentation has not.
thanks
--jim
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, jegunn wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Bart Oldeman wrote:
Thanks, Bart.
The other problem I alluded to still
I may have missed messages on this issue on the mailing list, and if so
apologies. I have used dosemu 1.0.2.1 for a couple of years under RH7.3 on
a dual 1.6GHz Athlon machine, running Generic CADD 6.0 under xdosemu with
wonderful results. I recently upgraded to FC2, (2.6.8) and discovered that
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hello.
jegunn wrote:
fine, but the cadd program now generates its screen a full factor of 50
more slowly than it did before.
Set $_hogthreshold=(0) in your dosemu.conf.
Thanks. I tried this a little while before I got your reply
