Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: add OMAP36xx support

2015-09-30 Thread Punit Agrawal
Hi Eduardo, Eduardo Valentin writes: > Add OMAP36xx support to ti-soc-thermal driver. This > chip is also unreliable. The data provided here is > based on OMAP36xx TRM: > http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/swpu177aa/swpu177aa.pdf > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

Re: [PATCH v2] thermal: consistently use int for temperatures

2015-07-21 Thread Punit Agrawal
-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner he...@sntech.de Reviewed-by: Peter Feuerer pe...@piie.net Cc: Punit Agrawal

Re: [PATCH] thermal: consistently use int for temperatures

2015-07-17 Thread Punit Agrawal
Hi Sascha, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de writes: The thermal code uses int, long and unsigned long for temperatures in different places. Using an unsigned type limits the thermal framework to positive temperatures without need. Also several drivers currently will report temperatures