* Arnd Bergmann [151208 02:26]:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 12:22:09 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 12/08/2015 11:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 08 December 2015 09:42:26 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > >> On 12/04/2015 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Please just drop the
On Tuesday 08 December 2015 12:22:09 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/08/2015 11:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 December 2015 09:42:26 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 12/04/2015 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> Please just drop the /bits/ 16 and use normal cells.
> >>>
> >>> Y
On 12/08/2015 11:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 09:42:26 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 12/04/2015 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Please just drop the /bits/ 16 and use normal cells.
>>>
>>> Yeah agreed, makes things less confusing for sure
>>
>> 4.4 will be the f
On Tuesday 08 December 2015 09:42:26 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/04/2015 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>
> >> Please just drop the /bits/ 16 and use normal cells.
> >
> > Yeah agreed, makes things less confusing for sure
>
> 4.4 will be the first kernel where we will have the new eDMA bind
On 12/08/2015 02:19 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Peter Ujfalusi [151204 02:46]:
>> +
>> +ti,tptcs = <&edma_tptc0 7>, <&edma_tptc1 5>,
>> + <&edma_tptc2 0>;
>> +
>> +ti,edma-memcpy-channels = /bits/ 16 <20 21>;
>
> Is this safe
On 12/04/2015 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann [151204 13:38]:
>> On Friday 04 December 2015 10:47:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
Peter Ujfalusi writes:
> @@ -174,12 +182,44 @@
> };
>
> edma: edma@4900 {
> - compati
* Peter Ujfalusi [151204 02:46]:
> +
> + ti,tptcs = <&edma_tptc0 7>, <&edma_tptc1 5>,
> +<&edma_tptc2 0>;
> +
> + ti,edma-memcpy-channels = /bits/ 16 <20 21>;
Is this safe to change to just ti,edma-memcpy-channels = <20 21> a
* Arnd Bergmann [151204 13:38]:
> On Friday 04 December 2015 10:47:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Peter Ujfalusi writes:
> > > > @@ -174,12 +182,44 @@
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > edma: edma@4900 {
> > > > - compatible = "ti,edma3";
> > > > -
On Friday 04 December 2015 10:47:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Peter Ujfalusi writes:
> > > @@ -174,12 +182,44 @@
> > > };
> > >
> > > edma: edma@4900 {
> > > - compatible = "ti,edma3";
> > > - ti,hwmods = "tpcc", "tptc0", "tptc1", "t
* Felipe Balbi [151204 09:23]:
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter Ujfalusi writes:
> > @@ -174,12 +182,44 @@
> > };
> >
> > edma: edma@4900 {
> > - compatible = "ti,edma3";
> > - ti,hwmods = "tpcc", "tptc0", "tptc1", "tptc2";
> > -
Hi,
Peter Ujfalusi writes:
> @@ -174,12 +182,44 @@
> };
>
> edma: edma@4900 {
> - compatible = "ti,edma3";
> - ti,hwmods = "tpcc", "tptc0", "tptc1", "tptc2";
> - reg = <0x4900 0x1>,
> -
Switch to use the ti,edma3-tpcc and ti,edma3-tptc binding for the eDMA3 and
enable the DMA even crossbar with ti,am335x-edma-crossbar.
With the new bindings boards can customize and tweak the DMA channel
priority to match their needs. With the new binding the memcpy is safe
to be used since with th
12 matches
Mail list logo
