Thanks for your suggestions.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On 02/21/2014 06:15 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Also, while at it get rid of the assumption in the code that "CC" is at reg
index 0 in the DT and x
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 06:15 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> Also, while at it get rid of the assumption in the code that "CC" is at reg
>>> index 0 in the DT and xbar is at offset 1. Instead use reg-names to get the
>>> memory resource in concern keepi
On 02/21/2014 06:15 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Also, while at it get rid of the assumption in the code that "CC" is at reg
>> index 0 in the DT and xbar is at offset 1. Instead use reg-names to get the
>> memory resource in concern keeping things much cleaner and simpler. This also
>> makes it poss
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:24:21PM -0600, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> index dc95efc..ae0ccae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> @@ -1469,11 +1470,14 @@ static int edma_xbar_event_map(struct device *dev,
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:24:21AM +, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Currently, EDMA driver uses of_address_to_resource for getting Channel
> controller and x-bar register resources. Use platform_get_resource_by_name
> instead regardless of whether its DT-boot or not, document the new reg-names
> prop
Currently, EDMA driver uses of_address_to_resource for getting Channel
controller and x-bar register resources. Use platform_get_resource_by_name
instead regardless of whether its DT-boot or not, document the new reg-names
properties.
Also, while at it get rid of the assumption in the code that "C
