el.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
>
>> To me it sounds like the it would be better to have unsigned
>> long irqflags in struct uart_port instead of trying to squeeze
>> the irqflags the flags field. We're already no
> To me it sounds like the it would be better to have unsigned
> long irqflags in struct uart_port instead of trying to squeeze
> the irqflags the flags field. We're already not covering all the
> irqflags currently like Marc pointed out.
Agreed.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
* Marc Zyngier [090612 22:31]:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:32:51 -0500
> Vikram Pandita wrote:
>
> > There is currently no provision for passing IRQ trigger flags for
> > serial IRQs with triggering requirements (such as GPIO IRQs.)
> >
> > This patch adds UPF_IRQ_TRIG_* flags which map on to IRQF
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:32:51 -0500
Vikram Pandita wrote:
> There is currently no provision for passing IRQ trigger flags for
> serial IRQs with triggering requirements (such as GPIO IRQs.)
>
> This patch adds UPF_IRQ_TRIG_* flags which map on to IRQF_TRIGGER_*
> flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram
There is currently no provision for passing IRQ trigger flags for
serial IRQs with triggering requirements (such as GPIO IRQs.)
This patch adds UPF_IRQ_TRIG_* flags which map on to IRQF_TRIGGER_*
flags.
Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman
---
drivers/serial/8250.c | 10
