On 03/12/2013 11:22 PM, Andrew Chew wrote:
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten
during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this
requirement.
I can test this tomorrow, but I have one comment:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Chew ac...@nvidia.com
+/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ static struct
+regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply =
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY(enable, NULL);
'enable' is just too generic, the device name should be also provided:
REGULATOR_SUPPLY(enable, pwm-backlight);
You're right. I don't
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:38:31PM -0700, Andrew Chew wrote:
+/* Dummy regulator for pwm-backlight driver */ static struct
+regulator_consumer_supply backlight_supply =
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY(enable, NULL);
'enable' is just too generic, the device name should be also provided:
From: Thierry Reding [mailto:thierry.red...@avionic-design.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:59 PM
To: Andrew Chew
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi; Alex Courbot; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] ARM: OMAP: board-4430sdp: Provide regulator
to pwm-backlight
* PGP Signed
The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten
during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this
requirement.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Chew ac...@nvidia.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c |5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git
