ject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM: Dynamic GPIO clock handling
>
>"ext Paul Walmsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hello Tero, Jouni,
>>
>> so is this basically a workaround patch?
>
>Yes in new format. Please do not use word workaround;)
>
>>
"ext Paul Walmsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Tero, Jouni,
>
> so is this basically a workaround patch?
Yes in new format. Please do not use word workaround;)
>
> a few comments:
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Tero Kristo wrote:
>
>> From: ext Jouni Hogander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> In oma
Hello Tero, Jouni,
so is this basically a workaround patch?
a few comments:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Tero Kristo wrote:
> From: ext Jouni Hogander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> In omap3 gpios 2-6 are in per domain. Functional clocks for these
> should be disabled.
>
> GPIO modules in PER domain are not
From: ext Jouni Hogander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In omap3 gpios 2-6 are in per domain. Functional clocks for these
should be disabled.
GPIO modules in PER domain are not able to act as a wake up source if
PER domain is in retention. PER domain sleep transition before MPU is
prevented by leaving icks
