* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [140908 07:26]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Thursday 04 September 2014 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [140904 06:51]:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer n
Hi Tony,
On Thursday 04 September 2014 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I [140904 06:51]:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have
>>> the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [140904 06:51]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have
> > the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of it as it's confusing.
> > No functional changes, just move the code and us
Hi Tony,
On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have
> the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of it as it's confusing.
> No functional changes, just move the code and use res instead
> of ret as we are not returning that va
We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have
the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of it as it's confusing.
No functional changes, just move the code and use res instead
of ret as we are not returning that value.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
---
drivers/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c | 72