Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On 28.08.2013 13:40, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 01:14 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 28/08/13 12:48, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: Hi, I'm seeing odd clock behavior with Beagle, booting with DT. I'm using v3.11-rc7 + DSS DT patches. I guess you are

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-04 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 04/09/13 10:29, Stefan Roese wrote: On 28.08.2013 13:40, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 01:14 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 28/08/13 12:48, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: Hi, I'm seeing odd clock behavior with Beagle, booting with DT. I'm using

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130901 23:50]: On 02/09/13 09:15, Tony Lindgren wrote: Yes but the old bindings still need to be supported because people are doing devices using those. So any kind of temporary binding will be a pain to support. If old bindings need to be

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, On Monday 02 September 2013 11:00:15 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 22/08/13 00:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Thanks for the comments! You're welcome. The exception to the above are DSI and DBI. DSI and DBI are combined control and video busses, but the use of the busses for control

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-02 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130830 02:55]: On 13/08/13 10:54, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130809 01:46]: So as is evident, I have things in my mind that should be improved. Maybe the most important question for short term future is: Can we

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-02 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 02/09/13 09:15, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130830 02:55]: On 13/08/13 10:54, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130809 01:46]: So as is evident, I have things in my mind that should be improved. Maybe the most important question

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-02 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 22/08/13 00:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Thanks for the comments! The exception to the above are DSI and DBI. DSI and DBI are combined control and video busses, but the use of the busses for control purposes is not independent of the video stream. Also, the the busses are, in practice,

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-08-30 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 13/08/13 10:54, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130809 01:46]: So as is evident, I have things in my mind that should be improved. Maybe the most important question for short term future is: Can we add DSS DT bindings for OMAP4 as unstable bindings? It would

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-08-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Tomi, I'm back from holidays and have finally found time to review your patch set. On Friday 09 August 2013 11:38:45 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: Hi, This is an RFC for OMAP Display DT support. The patches work fine, at least for me, but they are not perfect. I mostly don't have any clear

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-08-13 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130809 01:46]: So as is evident, I have things in my mind that should be improved. Maybe the most important question for short term future is: Can we add DSS DT bindings for OMAP4 as unstable bindings? It would give us some proper testing of the

[RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-08-09 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi, This is an RFC for OMAP Display DT support. The patches work fine, at least for me, but they are not perfect. I mostly don't have any clear questions about specific issues, but I would like to get feedback on the selected approaches in general, and also ideas how to proceed with the series.