Hi Hari,
From: "ext Kanigeri, Hari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:53:28 -0500
> > Focusing on checkpatch errors is a bit deceptive. It is
> > perfectly possible to be &qu
OTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:56:24 +0300
> Hi,
>
> * Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080816 12:58]:
> > Hi Vijay,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Pasam, Vij
From: "ext Trilok Soni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:56:59 +0530
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > H
CTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kanigeri, Hari; Ramirez Luna,
> Omar; Gupta, Ramesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pasam, Vijay
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-
> omap
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:16:29PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > Checkpat
pains in multiple
places everytime something changes upstream.
Regards,
Tony
>
> Hiroshi DOYU
>
> From: "ext Woodruff, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2
* Trilok Soni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080818 11:27]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080816 12:58]:
> >> Hi Vijay,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Pasam, Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTE
From: "ext Riku Voipio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:13:05 +0300
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:16:29PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > Checkpatch.pl is just a guide. Com
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:16:29PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> Checkpatch.pl is just a guide. Completely changing code for the tool isn't
> probably a good idea. It might even get you severally flamed on LKML :) The
> recent threads are informative (ok to read, bad to be in).
> Incidenta
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080816 12:58]:
>> Hi Vijay,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Pasam, Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'm not familiar with checkpatch, but I guess the p
Hi,
* Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080816 12:58]:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Pasam, Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm not familiar with checkpatch, but I guess the purpose is
> >> not to highlight functional issues.
> >>
> >> However, there are functional i
Hi Vijay,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Pasam, Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with checkpatch, but I guess the purpose is
>> not to highlight functional issues.
>>
>> However, there are functional issues, but it makes sense to
>> cleanup the code first: there's no point i
Hi Jon,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Hunter, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
>
>> > What TI has offered so far is code, and the comments have been on this
>> > code. You seem to want maintainers to understand that this is code
>> > that works "today", but I don't think the code
egards
Vijay
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 4:10 PM
> To: Woodruff, Richard
> Cc: Tony Lindgren; Hiroshi DOYU; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kanigeri, Hari; Ramirez Luna, Omar;
>
Hi Felipe,
> > What TI has offered so far is code, and the comments have been on this
> > code. You seem to want maintainers to understand that this is code
> > that works "today", but I don't think the code can be tested right now
> > since the tools (CE/Link) are not available out in the open.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Woodruff, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felipe Contreras
>
>
>
>> >> As part of contributing this code there has been a lot of reworking
>> of the code. Last I had heard checkpatch and sparse warnings had been
y nice if TI experts
participate.
As for the roadmap issue, I think that it's a matter of trade-off. The
more open it is, the more benefit it gets from the community;).
Hiroshi DOYU
From: "ext Woodruff, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRI
Hi Felipe,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felipe Contreras
> >> As part of contributing this code there has been a lot of reworking
> of the code. Last I had heard checkpatch and sparse warnings had been
> killed. There was also a lot of work in making sure there would be no
> legal impact to
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Felipe Contreras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Woodruff, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-omap-
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
>>> * Hiroshi DOYU <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Woodruff, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-omap-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
>> * Hiroshi DOYU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080815 13:34]:
>> > Thank you guys for your comments,
>> >
>> > It seems that s
Hi Khasim,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Syed Mohammed, Khasim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>
>> Really all the design, maintenance and test experience of that code is
>> inside of TI. This has lived
>> for years and derivates have shipped in products. Who ever watches over it
>> needs to
gt; Luna, Omar; Gupta,
> Ramesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pasam, Vijay
> Subject: RE: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
>
> Hi,
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-omap-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
>
Hi,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-omap-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> * Hiroshi DOYU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080815 13:34]:
> > Thank you guys for your comments,
> >
> > It seems that some of the patches couldn't be sent to ML because of
> > the size limitation of vger.ke
From: "ext Tony Lindgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicated branch in linux-omap
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:21:13 +0300
> * Hiroshi DOYU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080815 13:34]:
> > Thank you guys for your comments,
> >
thout any
> problems eventually.
We need to also figure out who's going to maintain the dspbridge
branch. Ideally somebody with experience with dsp and linux..
Regards,
Tony
>
> Hiroshi DOYU
>
> From: "ext Felipe Contreras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj
s momenent,
though..which doesn't mean "no probelm";p
I hope that everyone could work together on this branch without any
problems eventually.
Hiroshi DOYU
From: "ext Felipe Contreras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Port TI DSP BRIDGE for a new dedicat
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Trilok Soni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Doyu-San,
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Hiroshi DOYU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have ported the latest TI DSP BRIDGE from "omapzoom" to linux
>> omap. The purpose of this port is to get this
Hi Doyu-San,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Hiroshi DOYU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have ported the latest TI DSP BRIDGE from "omapzoom" to linux
> omap. The purpose of this port is to get this code kept in a new
> dedicated branch(ex: "dspbridge") in l-o, not intended to be
27 matches
Mail list logo
