On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:26PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Yeah, we lost some musb history when it went to mainline. I didn't test
this patch yet cuz I've been quite busy at work, but it should make
beagle work. Could you tell me if makes it work ?
This patch has been working for me until the latest
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:20:56AM -0700, Nathan Monson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:26PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Yeah, we lost some musb history when it went to mainline. I didn't test
this patch yet cuz I've been quite busy at work, but it should make
beagle work. Could you tell me if
On Friday 03 October 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:20:56AM -0700, Nathan Monson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:26PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Yeah, we lost some musb history when it went to mainline. I didn't test
this patch yet cuz I've been quite busy at work, but it
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:36 AM, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, without the patch, USB host doesn't work on the BeagleBoard.
I see it working ... there's a bit of oddness in a host-only config,
devices have to be plugged in after boot, but doesn't work seems
pretty
On Friday 03 October 2008, Nathan Monson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:36 AM, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, without the patch, USB host doesn't work on the
BeagleBoard.
I see it working ... there's a bit of oddness in a host-only config,
devices have to be
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Woodruff, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
-Original Message-
Where do you think the lineage of the hardware and software is? Do
you believe it just jumped into being in open source? All hardware and
software is full of deliberate design
From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 10:03 AM
In this case a tree is just like a branch. We have done some new
development outside on this branch to enable a new dma mode to boost
performance. Hopefully that will be folded back in before too
* Russell King - ARM Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080917 13:33]:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:57:25AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
If any ATAGs are needed, such as for the serial console, it needs to
be a generic ATAG for whole arch/arm.
Why is it needed for serial console anyway? We already
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:36 -0500, ext Woodruff, Richard wrote:
Where do you think the lineage of the hardware and software is? Do you
believe it just jumped into being in open source? All hardware and software
is full of deliberate design and hacks. Its true cooperate design constraints
Op 18 sep 2008, om 18:31 heeft David Brownell het volgende geschreven:
On Thursday 18 September 2008, Pandita, Vikram wrote:
And, no, I'm not going to try omapzoom stuff, I want it working on
the
canonical linux-omap kernel, not some corporate version with god
knows
how many hacks.
Op 18 sep 2008, om 11:55 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they aren't
Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And they aren't working too well with current l-o git either with MUSB being
broken. There's a patch to fix client mode, but host mode still isn't
working.
Host mode musb is working just fine on Overo
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Philip Balister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they aren't working too well with current l-o git either with MUSB
being
broken. There's a patch to fix client mode, but
Op 19 sep 2008, om 22:57 heeft Ashwin Bihari het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Philip Balister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they aren't working too well with current l-o
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:09:04PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 18 sep 2008, om 11:55 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16
Op 19 sep 2008, om 23:24 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:09:04PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 18 sep 2008, om 11:55 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:34:13PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
If I boot up the .26 l-o kernel with mini-a attached, it works as
expected.
What happens if you boot without anything attached then, after probe,
attach the mini-/micro-A ? The behavior you describe I recall having
working on one
On Friday 19 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote:
Ok, another datapoint: client mode (tested on beagle by Måns) and host
mode (tested on overo by Steve) work with a similar patch as above,
OTG mode is broken (tested on beagle and evm by me).
one issue being that TWL4030 irqs don't cause the
Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they aren't working too well with current
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they aren't working too well with current l-o git either with MUSB
being
broken.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felipe
Balbi
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:26 PM
To: ext Koen Kooi
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Mailing List
Subject: Re: OMAP support in mainline?
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200
Op 18 sep 2008, om 11:55 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they aren't
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 01:16:55PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 18 sep 2008, om 11:55 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:23:49PM +0200, ext Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Koen
Kooi
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 4:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Mailing List
Subject: Re: OMAP support in mainline?
Op 18 sep 2008, om 11:55 heeft Felipe
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:21 +0530, ext Pandita, Vikram wrote:
And, no, I'm not going to try omapzoom stuff, I want it working on the
canonical linux-omap kernel, not some corporate version with god knows
how many hacks.
Your wish.
I thought debugging and fixing the issue was more
-Original Message-
From: Igor Stoppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:24 PM
To: Pandita, Vikram
Cc: Koen Kooi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Mailing List
Subject: RE: OMAP support in mainline?
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:21 +0530, ext
And, no, I'm not going to try omapzoom stuff, I want it working on
the
canonical linux-omap kernel, not some corporate version with god
knows
how many hacks.
Your wish.
I thought debugging and fixing the issue was more important than the
source of the fix !!!
YES!
You have
On Thursday 18 September 2008, Pandita, Vikram wrote:
And, no, I'm not going to try omapzoom stuff, I want it working on the
canonical linux-omap kernel, not some corporate version with god knows
how many hacks.
Your wish.
I thought debugging and fixing the issue was more important
On Thursday 18 September 2008, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
It would be nice if whatever code was on the main branch was not
so frequently broken.
That's (at least) a current problem. And the issue is how
to fix it... a *big* part of that involves having enough
(and current-enough) OMAP code in
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully we'll get all core 24xx and 34xx files integrated soon. But
then there are tons of board-*.c files missing from mainline that
probably need to be cleaned up a bit.
What about sending the board to standby via
Op 17 sep 2008, om 07:55 heeft David Brownell het volgende geschreven:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
I think one good measure for this whole work when one can can run
Beagle or Overo with mainline kernel.
Yes ... ideally for 2.6.28 for both. The Overo boards handed
Op 17 sep 2008, om 14:24 heeft Steve Sakoman het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And they aren't working too well with current l-o git either with
MUSB being
broken. There's a patch to fix client mode, but host mode still isn't
* Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080917 09:55]:
* Kalle Valo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080916 23:32]:
Jarkko Nikula [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:25:06 -0700
ext Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully we'll get all core 24xx and 34xx files integrated soon.
* Kalle Valo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080916 23:32]:
Jarkko Nikula [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:25:06 -0700
ext Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully we'll get all core 24xx and 34xx files integrated soon. But
then there are tons of board-*.c files missing
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:57:25AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
If any ATAGs are needed, such as for the serial console, it needs to
be a generic ATAG for whole arch/arm.
Why is it needed for serial console anyway? We already have a cross-
architecture way of defining the console - it's the
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Kalle Valo wrote:
Hello Linux OMAP community,
I have seen a lot of patches going to Russell and general talk about
mainline support. What is actually the current situation? Is there
hope to have good support in mainline soon? If yes, when?
Unsurprisingly I'm
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:13:21AM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Kalle Valo wrote:
Hello Linux OMAP community,
I have seen a lot of patches going to Russell and general talk about
mainline support. What is actually the current situation? Is there
hope to have good
* Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080916 11:42]:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:13:21AM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Kalle Valo wrote:
Hello Linux OMAP community,
I have seen a lot of patches going to Russell and general talk about
mainline support. What is
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:25:06 -0700
ext Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully we'll get all core 24xx and 34xx files integrated soon. But
then there are tons of board-*.c files missing from mainline that
probably need to be cleaned up a bit.
I think one good measure for this whole
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
I think one good measure for this whole work when one can can run
Beagle or Overo with mainline kernel.
Yes ... ideally for 2.6.28 for both. The Overo boards handed
out at the kernel summit are a bit visible right now as not
yet booting with
40 matches
Mail list logo
