Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: phy: twl4030-usb: Move code from twl4030_phy_power to the runtime PM calls

2014-09-08 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi Tony, On Thursday 04 September 2014 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [140904 06:51]: Hi Tony, On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid

Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: phy: twl4030-usb: Move code from twl4030_phy_power to the runtime PM calls

2014-09-08 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [140908 07:26]: Hi Tony, On Thursday 04 September 2014 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [140904 06:51]: Hi Tony, On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any

Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: phy: twl4030-usb: Move code from twl4030_phy_power to the runtime PM calls

2014-09-04 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi Tony, On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of it as it's confusing. No functional changes, just move the code and use res instead of ret as we are not returning that

Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: phy: twl4030-usb: Move code from twl4030_phy_power to the runtime PM calls

2014-09-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [140904 06:51]: Hi Tony, On Thursday 28 August 2014 04:58 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: We don't need twl4030_phy_power() any longer now that we have the runtime PM calls. Let's get rid of it as it's confusing. No functional changes, just move the code