...@ti.com, Archit Taneja
a0393...@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:55:27 +0200
Subject: Re: v3.4-rc4 DSS PM problem (Was: Re: Problems with 3.4-rc5)
Hi Tomi, Paul!
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Tomi Valkeinen
tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:15 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Was there ever a conclussion to this discussion?
I'm assuming this is unlikely to be fixed in 3.5?
If by conclusion you mean full understanding and a proper fix, then no.
But the patch 3568f2a46f2a73bab18c914df06afd98a97e0e0e (OMAPDSS:
Subject: Re: v3.4-rc4 DSS PM problem (Was: Re: Problems with 3.4-rc5)
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:15 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Was there ever a conclussion to this discussion?
I'm assuming this is unlikely to be fixed in 3.5?
If by conclusion you mean full understanding and a proper fix
...@vger.kernel.org
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:37:04 +0300
Subject: Re: v3.4-rc4 DSS PM problem (Was: Re: Problems with 3.4-rc5)
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:15 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Was there ever a conclussion to this discussion?
I'm assuming this is unlikely to be fixed in 3.5
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 18:39 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
cc Jean
Hello Tomi,
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I also suspect that this could be just a plain DSS bug. The default FIFO
low/high thresholds are 960/1023 bytes (i.e. DSS starts refilling the
FIFO when there are
Hi Tomi, Paul!
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 18:39 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
cc Jean
Hello Tomi,
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I also suspect that this could be just a plain DSS bug. The default FIFO
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:09 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 5/16/2012 11:08 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Disabling DPLL3 autoidle fixes the problem. Disabling DPLL4 autoidle
doesn't affect the problem.
The issues your are facing seems to be the well known DSS low power
refresh
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
JFYI, I also tested changing DISPC's SYSCONFIG:CLOCKACTIVITY, which, to
me, sounds a bit related to dpll autoidle. By default it's 0, interface
and functional clocks can be switched off. I tested the three other
values, but none of them had any
cc Jean
Hello Tomi,
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I also suspect that this could be just a plain DSS bug. The default FIFO
low/high thresholds are 960/1023 bytes (i.e. DSS starts refilling the
FIFO when there are 960 or less bytes in the fifo, and stops at 1023.
The fifo is
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 11:55 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Tomi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I've been doing testing to understand the problem, but so far I don't
have any idea why things go wrong. I haven't found out any logic in
which configuration works and which
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:08 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 11:55 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Tomi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I've been doing testing to understand the problem, but so far I don't
have any idea why things go wrong. I
Hi Tomi,
On 5/16/2012 11:08 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 11:55 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Tomi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I've been doing testing to understand the problem, but so far I don't
have any idea why things go wrong. I haven't found out
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:48 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com writes:
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 08:36 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Any news on this?
This thread seems to have gone a little quiet...
Hi,
I've been doing testing to understand the problem,
Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com writes:
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:48 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com writes:
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 08:36 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Any news on this?
This thread seems to have gone a little quiet...
Hi,
I've
Hello Tomi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I've been doing testing to understand the problem, but so far I don't
have any idea why things go wrong. I haven't found out any logic in
which configuration works and which doesn't. Looks to me that for some
reason the PM prevents DSS
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 16:26:38 +0300
Subject: Re: v3.4-rc4 DSS PM problem (Was: Re: Problems with 3.4-rc5)
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:58 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi Kevin, Paul,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:09 +0100, Joe Woodward
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 08:36 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Any news on this?
This thread seems to have gone a little quiet...
Hi,
I've been doing testing to understand the problem, but so far I don't
have any idea why things go wrong. I haven't found out any logic in
which configuration works
Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com writes:
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 08:36 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Any news on this?
This thread seems to have gone a little quiet...
Hi,
I've been doing testing to understand the problem, but so far I don't
have any idea why things go wrong. I haven't
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:58 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi Kevin, Paul,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:09 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Ok, I can replicate it now. It seems to be somehow PM related. I
normally have USB gadget
Hi Kevin, Paul,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:09 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Ok, I can replicate it now. It seems to be somehow PM related. I
normally have USB gadget stuff compiled into kernel so that I can
boot
via nfsroot with usb. After disabling USB support from the kernel, I
can
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:54 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Hi Kevin, Paul,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:09 +0100, Joe Woodward wrote:
Ok, I can replicate it now. It seems to be somehow PM related. I
normally have USB gadget stuff compiled into kernel so that I can
boot
via nfsroot
21 matches
Mail list logo