[patch] OMAPDSS: DSI: cleanup DSI_IRQ_ERROR_MASK define
DSI_IRQ_SYNC_LOST was ORed twice so we can remove one. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenterdiff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dsi.c index b3606de..e86df6d 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dsi.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/dss/dsi.c @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct dsi_reg { u16 module; u16 idx; }; #define DSI_IRQ_TA_TIMEOUT (1 << 20) #define DSI_IRQ_ERROR_MASK \ (DSI_IRQ_HS_TX_TIMEOUT | DSI_IRQ_LP_RX_TIMEOUT | DSI_IRQ_SYNC_LOST | \ - DSI_IRQ_TA_TIMEOUT | DSI_IRQ_SYNC_LOST) + DSI_IRQ_TA_TIMEOUT) #define DSI_IRQ_CHANNEL_MASK 0xf /* Virtual channel interrupts */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
Hi On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Daniel.wrote: > Hi Michael, > > It's a plain linux. I'm considering upgrading kernel as last option. > Variscite doesn't > support another kernel for this SoM so this would be a really hard > work. I'm looking > for a solution on this kernel and mainly trying to understand why > usbhost_48m_fck > is not getting enabled. I'm contacting Variscite in parallel. > Can you point me to te module description? I think that the module is working if it's compiled in. Correct? Michael > Thanks for your reply, best regards! > > 2015-11-23 16:57 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : >> Hi Daniel >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Daniel. wrote: >>> Hi every body! >>> >>> I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree >>> (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). >>> The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). >>> >>> I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: >>> http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi >>> >> >> Do you have an android device? or it's just plain linux. >> For option 2 I suggest to move on newest kernel >> >> Michael >> >>> Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to >>> access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what >>> I think is happening since the message >>> "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present >>> before the crash, and since the crash happens at first read o uhh >>> registers. I just can't figure out why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting >>> enabled and how to check if is trully disabled. >>> >>> Any ideas? >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> "Do or do not. There is no try" >>> Yoda Master >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in >>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >> >> -- >> | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | >> | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | >> | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | >> | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | > > > > -- > "Do or do not. There is no try" > Yoda Master > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
Hi, Building as built-in doesn't solve my problem. The difference is that when compiled as module the dump shows up when I load it, and when is built-in the dump shows up at boot time. Also when built-in the problem seems to ocurr when device is reseted (on ehci_omap_stop) and the first stack dump is followed by much more other dumps. At the end I can see something like: "Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!" Here is the module info: root@csi:~# modinfo ehci-hcd filename: /lib/modules/2.6.37+/kernel/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.ko author: Felipe Balbiauthor: Texas Instruments, Inc. alias: platform:omap-ehci license:GPL author: David Brownell description:USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver srcversion: B282C11CACFB9E75921367C depends: vermagic: 2.6.37+ mod_unload modversions ARMv7 parm: log2_irq_thresh:log2 IRQ latency, 1-64 microframes (int) parm: park:park setting; 1-3 back-to-back async packets (uint) parm: ignore_oc:ignore bogus hardware overcurrent indications (bool) parm: hird:host initiated resume duration, +1 for each 75us (int) root@csi:~# Best regards, 2015-11-23 17:55 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : > Hi > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Daniel. wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> It's a plain linux. I'm considering upgrading kernel as last option. >> Variscite doesn't >> support another kernel for this SoM so this would be a really hard >> work. I'm looking >> for a solution on this kernel and mainly trying to understand why >> usbhost_48m_fck >> is not getting enabled. I'm contacting Variscite in parallel. >> > > Can you point me to te module description? I think that the module > is working if it's compiled in. Correct? > > Michael > > >> Thanks for your reply, best regards! >> >> 2015-11-23 16:57 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : >>> Hi Daniel >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Daniel. wrote: Hi every body! I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi >>> >>> Do you have an android device? or it's just plain linux. >>> For option 2 I suggest to move on newest kernel >>> >>> Michael >>> Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what I think is happening since the message "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present before the crash, and since the crash happens at first read o uhh registers. I just can't figure out why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting enabled and how to check if is trully disabled. Any ideas? Thanks in advance! Regards, -- "Do or do not. There is no try" Yoda Master -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | >>> | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | >>> | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | >>> | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | >> >> >> >> -- >> "Do or do not. There is no try" >> Yoda Master >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | > | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | > | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | > | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | -- "Do or do not. There is no try" Yoda Master -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
Hi Can you check if you have this patch in? commit 3c82e229f09a6acc8d24dc27c5e0e60b1d7161c2 Author: Paul WalmsleyDate: Fri Jul 24 19:44:06 2009 -0600 OMAP3 clock: correct module IDLEST bits: SSI; DSS; USBHOST; HSOTGUSB Fix two bugs in the OMAP3 clock tree pertaining to the SSI, DSS, USBHOST, and HSOTGUSB devices. These devices are both interconnect initiators and targets. Without this patch, clk_enable()s on clocks for these modules can be very high latency (potentially up to ~200 milliseconds) and message such as the following are generated: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries Two bugs are fixed by this patch. First, OMAP hardware only supports target CM_IDLEST register bits on ES2+ chips and beyond. ES1 chips should not wait for these clocks to enable. So, split the appropriate clocks into ES1 and ES2+ variants, so that kernels running on ES1 devices won't try to wait. Second, the current heuristic in omap2_clk_dflt_find_idlest() will fail for these clocks. It assumes that the CM_IDLEST bit to wait upon is the same as the CM_*CLKEN bit, which is false[1]. Fix by implementing custom clkops .find_idlest function pointers for the appropriate clocks that return the correct slave IDLEST bit shift. This was originally fixed in the linux-omap kernel during 2.6.29 in a slightly different manner[2][3]. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Daniel. wrote: > Hi, > > Building as built-in doesn't solve my problem. The difference is that > when compiled as module the dump shows up when I load it, and when is > built-in the dump shows up at boot time. Also when built-in the > problem seems to ocurr when device is reseted (on ehci_omap_stop) and > the first stack dump is followed by much more other dumps. At the end > I can see something like: "Fixing recursive fault but reboot is > needed!" > > > Here is the module info: > root@csi:~# modinfo ehci-hcd > filename: /lib/modules/2.6.37+/kernel/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.ko > author: Felipe Balbi > author: Texas Instruments, Inc. > alias: platform:omap-ehci > license:GPL > author: David Brownell > description:USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver > srcversion: B282C11CACFB9E75921367C > depends: > vermagic: 2.6.37+ mod_unload modversions ARMv7 > parm: log2_irq_thresh:log2 IRQ latency, 1-64 microframes (int) > parm: park:park setting; 1-3 back-to-back async packets (uint) > parm: ignore_oc:ignore bogus hardware overcurrent indications (bool) > parm: hird:host initiated resume duration, +1 for each 75us > (int) > root@csi:~# > > > Best regards, > > 2015-11-23 17:55 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Daniel. wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> It's a plain linux. I'm considering upgrading kernel as last option. >>> Variscite doesn't >>> support another kernel for this SoM so this would be a really hard >>> work. I'm looking >>> for a solution on this kernel and mainly trying to understand why >>> usbhost_48m_fck >>> is not getting enabled. I'm contacting Variscite in parallel. >>> >> >> Can you point me to te module description? I think that the module >> is working if it's compiled in. Correct? >> >> Michael >> >> >>> Thanks for your reply, best regards! >>> >>> 2015-11-23 16:57 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : Hi Daniel On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Daniel. wrote: > Hi every body! > > I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree > (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). > The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). > > I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: > http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi > Do you have an android device? or it's just plain linux. For option 2 I suggest to move on newest kernel Michael > Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to > access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what > I think is happening since the message > "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present > before the crash, and since the crash happens at first read o uhh > registers. I just can't figure out why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting > enabled and how to check if is trully disabled. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance! > Regards, > > -- > "Do or do not. There is no try" > Yoda Master > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at
Re: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
I've already tried, it fails to apply. My tree is based on last commit from TI linux-omap3 (4f1fb3bea4cc381c76e8e439f8af393c1a698dfc) so I *think* that this is already applied (since come from the same tree). I will try to apply it by hand Thanks! Regards, 2015-11-23 18:10 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi: > Hi > > Can you check if you have this patch in? > > commit 3c82e229f09a6acc8d24dc27c5e0e60b1d7161c2 > Author: Paul Walmsley > Date: Fri Jul 24 19:44:06 2009 -0600 > > OMAP3 clock: correct module IDLEST bits: SSI; DSS; USBHOST; HSOTGUSB > > Fix two bugs in the OMAP3 clock tree pertaining to the SSI, DSS, > USBHOST, and HSOTGUSB devices. These devices are both interconnect > initiators and targets. Without this patch, clk_enable()s on clocks for > these modules can be very high latency (potentially up to ~200 > milliseconds) and message such as the following are generated: > > Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries > > Two bugs are fixed by this patch. First, OMAP hardware only supports > target CM_IDLEST register bits on ES2+ chips and beyond. ES1 chips > should not wait for these clocks to enable. So, split the appropriate > clocks into ES1 and ES2+ variants, so that kernels running on ES1 > devices won't try to wait. > > Second, the current heuristic in omap2_clk_dflt_find_idlest() will > fail for these clocks. It assumes that the CM_IDLEST bit to wait upon > is the same as the CM_*CLKEN bit, which is false[1]. Fix by > implementing custom clkops .find_idlest function pointers for the > appropriate clocks that return the correct slave IDLEST bit shift. > > This was originally fixed in the linux-omap kernel during 2.6.29 in a > slightly different manner[2][3]. > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Daniel. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Building as built-in doesn't solve my problem. The difference is that >> when compiled as module the dump shows up when I load it, and when is >> built-in the dump shows up at boot time. Also when built-in the >> problem seems to ocurr when device is reseted (on ehci_omap_stop) and >> the first stack dump is followed by much more other dumps. At the end >> I can see something like: "Fixing recursive fault but reboot is >> needed!" >> >> >> Here is the module info: >> root@csi:~# modinfo ehci-hcd >> filename: /lib/modules/2.6.37+/kernel/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.ko >> author: Felipe Balbi >> author: Texas Instruments, Inc. >> alias: platform:omap-ehci >> license:GPL >> author: David Brownell >> description:USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver >> srcversion: B282C11CACFB9E75921367C >> depends: >> vermagic: 2.6.37+ mod_unload modversions ARMv7 >> parm: log2_irq_thresh:log2 IRQ latency, 1-64 microframes (int) >> parm: park:park setting; 1-3 back-to-back async packets (uint) >> parm: ignore_oc:ignore bogus hardware overcurrent indications >> (bool) >> parm: hird:host initiated resume duration, +1 for each 75us >> (int) >> root@csi:~# >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> 2015-11-23 17:55 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : >>> Hi >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Daniel. wrote: Hi Michael, It's a plain linux. I'm considering upgrading kernel as last option. Variscite doesn't support another kernel for this SoM so this would be a really hard work. I'm looking for a solution on this kernel and mainly trying to understand why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting enabled. I'm contacting Variscite in parallel. >>> >>> Can you point me to te module description? I think that the module >>> is working if it's compiled in. Correct? >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> Thanks for your reply, best regards! 2015-11-23 16:57 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi : > Hi Daniel > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Daniel. wrote: >> Hi every body! >> >> I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree >> (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). >> The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). >> >> I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: >> http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi >> > > Do you have an android device? or it's just plain linux. > For option 2 I suggest to move on newest kernel > > Michael > >> Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to >> access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what >> I think is happening since the message >> "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present >> before the crash, and since the
Re: [PATCH v2] hw_random: omap3-rom-rng: convert timer to delayed work
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:59:01PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > We cannot put the HW RNG to idle using a timer because we cannot disable > clocks from atomic context. Use a delayed work instead. > > Fixes a warning with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES on Nokia N900 during boot. > > Reported-by: Sebastian Reichel> Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen Patch applied. Thanks. -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry
On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > Adding devicetree list. > > > > Thread starts at > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html > > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Pali Rohár[151105 03:41]: > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Rohár wrote: > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Pali Rohár [151012 13:29]: > > > On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >> > > >> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments > > >> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree > > >> what needs to be done. > > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series. > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > Pavel Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and discarded. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+ McASP(3) support for DRA7xx family
Tony, On 11/12/2015 08:00 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Peter Ujfalusi[15 23:33]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> Changes since v3: >> - rebased on mainline's HEAD >> - Added Tested-by from Felipe >> - Added Acked-by from Paul for the hwmod patches >> >> Changes since v2: >> - DTS patch added which is needed because of the clock handling changes >> >> Felip Balbi reported that linux-next is broken right now since the DTS part >> of >> the earlier series has been applied, but we do not have the mcasp hwmod in >> the >> kernel: >> ... >> [0.181029] platform 48468000.mcasp: Cannot lookup hwmod 'mcasp3' >> ... >> [6.121072] davinci-mcasp 48468000.mcasp: _od_fail_runtime_resume: FIXME: >> missing hwmod/omap_dev info >> [6.130790] [ cut here ] >> [6.135643] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 244 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147 >> l3_interrupt_handler+0x220/0x34c() >> [6.145576] 4400.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER MPU TARGET L4_PER2_P3 >> (Read): Data Access in User mode during Functional access > > > Thanks applying all three into omap-for-v4.4/fixes. Do you know when these patches are going to be merged to mainline? 4.4-rc2 is out, but it does not include them. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
Hi every body! I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what I think is happening since the message "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present before the crash, and since the crash happens at first read o uhh registers. I just can't figure out why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting enabled and how to check if is trully disabled. Any ideas? Thanks in advance! Regards, -- "Do or do not. There is no try" Yoda Master -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
Hi Daniel On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Daniel.wrote: > Hi every body! > > I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree > (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). > The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). > > I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: > http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi > Do you have an android device? or it's just plain linux. For option 2 I suggest to move on newest kernel Michael > Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to > access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what > I think is happening since the message > "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present > before the crash, and since the crash happens at first read o uhh > registers. I just can't figure out why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting > enabled and how to check if is trully disabled. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance! > Regards, > > -- > "Do or do not. There is no try" > Yoda Master > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 100000 tries and crash
Hi Michael, It's a plain linux. I'm considering upgrading kernel as last option. Variscite doesn't support another kernel for this SoM so this would be a really hard work. I'm looking for a solution on this kernel and mainly trying to understand why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting enabled. I'm contacting Variscite in parallel. Thanks for your reply, best regards! 2015-11-23 16:57 GMT-02:00 Michael Trimarchi: > Hi Daniel > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Daniel. wrote: >> Hi every body! >> >> I'm running a (2.6.37) kernel based on linux-omap tree >> (http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=summary). >> The board is a SoM from Variscite (var-som-am3517). >> >> I've compiled the ehci-hcd as a module. When I enable it I got this dump: >> http://pastebin.com/5idXXBBi >> > > Do you have an android device? or it's just plain linux. > For option 2 I suggest to move on newest kernel > > Michael > >> Googling arroud I found that this can be triggered while trying to >> access uhh registers when usbhost_48m_fck is not enabled. This is what >> I think is happening since the message >> "Clock usbhost_48m_fck didn't enable in 10 tries" is aways present >> before the crash, and since the crash happens at first read o uhh >> registers. I just can't figure out why usbhost_48m_fck is not getting >> enabled and how to check if is trully disabled. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> Regards, >> >> -- >> "Do or do not. There is no try" >> Yoda Master >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV | > | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 | > | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL | > | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com | -- "Do or do not. There is no try" Yoda Master -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP: RX-51: fix a typo in log writing
Fix a typo when registering HW RNG. Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen--- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c index 14edcd7..ff1520b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static struct platform_device omap3_rom_rng_device = { static void __init rx51_init_omap3_rom_rng(void) { if (omap_type() == OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_SEC) { - pr_info("RX-51: Registring OMAP3 HWRNG device\n"); + pr_info("RX-51: Registering OMAP3 HWRNG device\n"); platform_device_register(_rom_rng_device); } } diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c index 1dfe346..35ea6c0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static void __init nokia_n900_legacy_init(void) pr_warn("Thumb binaries may crash randomly without this workaround\n"); } - pr_info("RX-51: Registring OMAP3 HWRNG device\n"); + pr_info("RX-51: Registering OMAP3 HWRNG device\n"); platform_device_register(_rom_rng_device); } -- 2.4.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html