[PATCH v4 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c

2013-09-04 Thread George Cherian
This patch series - removes the irq_demux_work - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done. v1 -- v2 Split v1 to 3 patches v2 -- v3 Remove the unnecessary dts patches. v3 -- v4 Remove gpio-irq (in patch 2) Note:

[PATCH v3 2/3] gpio: pcf857x: remove the irq_demux_work and gpio-irq

2013-09-04 Thread George Cherian
Now that we are using devm_request_threaded_irq no need for irq_demux_work and gpio-irq. Remove all its references. Signed-off-by: George Cherian george.cher...@ti.com --- drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 37 - 1 file changed, 37 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: pcf857x: call the gpio user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done

2013-09-04 Thread George Cherian
For pcf857x driver if the initial state is not set properly (proper n_latch is not passed), we get bad irq prints on console. We get this only for the first interrupt and doesnot repeat for further interrupts unles and until there are other gpio pins which are not flipping continously. following

[PATCH v3 1/3] gpio: pcf857x: change to devm_request_threaded_irq

2013-09-04 Thread George Cherian
Remove the request_irq and use devm_request_threaded_irq also cleanup free_irq. devm_* takes care of that. Signed-off-by: George Cherian george.cher...@ti.com --- drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 28 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-04 Thread Stefan Roese
On 28.08.2013 13:40, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 01:14 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 28/08/13 12:48, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: Hi, I'm seeing odd clock behavior with Beagle, booting with DT. I'm using v3.11-rc7 + DSS DT patches. I guess you are

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-04 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 04/09/13 10:29, Stefan Roese wrote: On 28.08.2013 13:40, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 01:14 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 28/08/13 12:48, Tero Kristo wrote: On 08/28/2013 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: Hi, I'm seeing odd clock behavior with Beagle, booting with DT. I'm using

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1

2013-09-04 Thread Pali Rohár
On Sunday 11 August 2013 20:36:40 Ивайло Димитров wrote: Оригинално писмо От: Dave Martin Относно: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1 До: Pali Rohár Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2013, Август 5

Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] PHY framework

2013-09-04 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On Tuesday 03 September 2013 09:20 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:55:23PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Hi Greg, On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:50 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:44:49PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: On Wednesday 21

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1

2013-09-04 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: On Sunday 11 August 2013 20:36:40 Ивайло Димитров wrote: Оригинално писмо От: Dave Martin Относно: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1

ARM: OMAP2: Make MACH_OMAP3EVM select NOP_USB_XCEIV

2013-09-04 Thread Josh Boyer
The board-omap3evm.c file unconditionally calls usb_nop_xceiv_register but doesn't ensure this is built-in. This can lead to build failures like: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap3_evm_init': linux-3.12.0-0.rc0.git2.1.fc21.armv7hl/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:686:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 3, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Suman Anna wrote: Kumar, On 09/03/2013 01:50 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote: HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for

Re: [PATCHv3 0/9] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: Add suspend-resume support

2013-09-04 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Dave, Thanks for taking the time to try this out, it does seem there are a few kinks with BeagleBone Black but we'll get those worked out. I also just noticed that wake from RTC isn't working, but wake from serial console does. Does RTC wake work for you? (I use rtcwake -m mem -s4) Kevin

Re: [PATCHv3 0/9] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: Add suspend-resume support

2013-09-04 Thread Kevin Hilman
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Russ Dill russ.d...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: Hi Dave, Thanks for taking the time to try this out, it does seem there are a few kinks with BeagleBone Black but we'll get those worked out. I also just

Re: [PATCHv3 0/9] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: Add suspend-resume support

2013-09-04 Thread Russ Dill
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote: Hi Dave, Thanks for taking the time to try this out, it does seem there are a few kinks with BeagleBone Black but we'll get those worked out. I also just noticed that wake from RTC isn't working, but wake from serial

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Suman Anna
Kumar, HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com ---

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Suman Anna
On 09/04/2013 03:09 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: Hi Suman, Thanks for the patch. On 09/03/2013 08:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote: HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for parsing the DT nodes, and

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: add AM33XX EDMA support

2013-09-04 Thread Benoit Cousson
Hi Joel, On 31/08/2013 03:19, Joel Fernandes wrote: Hi Benoit, On 08/26/2013 03:36 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: - minus all the TI emails which are not working anymore :-( I've just sent my previous email too soon... Now the patch is different :-) I'll take that one. Unfortunately this patch

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Suman Anna wrote: Kumar, HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code dealing with the traditional platform device

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: add AM33XX EDMA support

2013-09-04 Thread Joel Fernandes
On 09/04/2013 11:31 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: Hi Joel, On 31/08/2013 03:19, Joel Fernandes wrote: Hi Benoit, On 08/26/2013 03:36 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: - minus all the TI emails which are not working anymore :-( I've just sent my previous email too soon... Now the patch is different

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Suman Anna
HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com ---

Re: [RFC 00/22] OMAPDSS: DT support

2013-09-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com [130901 23:50]: On 02/09/13 09:15, Tony Lindgren wrote: Yes but the old bindings still need to be supported because people are doing devices using those. So any kind of temporary binding will be a pain to support. If old bindings need to be

Re: [RFC 3/4] Misc: SRAM: Hack for allowing executable code in SRAM.

2013-09-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russ Dill russ.d...@ti.com [130903 09:52]: The generic SRAM mechanism does not ioremap memory in a manner that allows code to be executed from SRAM. There is currently no generic way to request ioremap to return a memory area with execution allowed. Insert a temporary hack for proof of

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Suman Anna wrote: HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes

2013-09-04 Thread Suman Anna
On 09/04/2013 12:51 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Suman Anna wrote: HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs, which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code dealing with the

Re: [RFC 0/4] Create infrastructure for running C code from SRAM.

2013-09-04 Thread Emilio López
Hi, El 03/09/13 13:44, Russ Dill escribió: This RFC patchset explores an idea for loading C code into SRAM. Currently, all the code I'm aware of that needs to run from SRAM is written in assembler. The most common reason for code needing to run from SRAM is that the memory controller is being

Re: [PATCHv3 7/8] mailbox/omap: add code to support the wkupm3 operations

2013-09-04 Thread Suman Anna
Kevin, Sorry, I couldn't get back earlier due to long weekend. On 08/29/2013 11:57 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com writes: [...] Yeah, the wkupm3 mbox usage is actually odd (an unfortunate result of the way the hardware is designed) heh, design is a generous term for

[PATCH] ARM: omap2: throw the die id into the entropy pool

2013-09-04 Thread Linus Walleij
Atleast eight bytes of this number are totally unique for the device it seems, so this is a perfect candidate for feeding the entropy pool. One byte more or less of constants does not matter so feed in the entire OID struct. Cc: Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com

Re: [RFC 0/4] Create infrastructure for running C code from SRAM.

2013-09-04 Thread Russ Dill
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Emilio López emi...@elopez.com.ar wrote: Hi, El 03/09/13 13:44, Russ Dill escribió: This RFC patchset explores an idea for loading C code into SRAM. Currently, all the code I'm aware of that needs to run from SRAM is written in assembler. The most common

Re: [PATCHv3 7/8] mailbox/omap: add code to support the wkupm3 operations

2013-09-04 Thread Kevin Hilman
Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com writes: Kevin, Sorry, I couldn't get back earlier due to long weekend. On 08/29/2013 11:57 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com writes: [...] Yeah, the wkupm3 mbox usage is actually odd (an unfortunate result of the way the hardware is designed)

Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: throw the die id into the entropy pool

2013-09-04 Thread Kevin Hilman
Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org writes: Atleast eight bytes of this number are totally unique for the device it seems, so this is a perfect candidate for feeding the entropy pool. One byte more or less of constants does not matter so feed in the entire OID struct. Cc: Theodore Ts'o

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] v4l: ti-vpe: Add VPE mem to mem driver

2013-09-04 Thread Archit Taneja
Hi Hans, On Thursday 29 August 2013 06:58 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Thu 29 August 2013 14:32:49 Archit Taneja wrote: VPE is a block which consists of a single memory to memory path which can perform chrominance up/down sampling, de-interlacing, scaling, and color space conversion of raster or