On 10/21/2015 11:42 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 05:35, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>>> Anyways I am OK too, if you guys want to fix it with a platform
>>> specific quirk. Let me know I'll pick this patch.
>>
>> I haven't gotten a chance to try #1, and I won't be able
On 22 October 2015 at 05:35, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Anyways I am OK too, if you guys want to fix it with a platform
>> specific quirk. Let me know I'll pick this patch.
>
> I haven't gotten a chance to try #1, and I won't be able to look at it
> atleast for another month. I
Hi Jassi,
On 10/20/2015 11:44 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires
>> either its controller implementations or clients to run the state
>> machine for the Tx queue. The
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires
> either its controller implementations or clients to run the state
> machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox controller uses a Tx-ready
> interrupt as
The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires
either its controller implementations or clients to run the state
machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox controller uses a Tx-ready
interrupt as the equivalent of a Tx-done interrupt to run this Tx
queue state-machine.
The