Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mailbox/omap: Add ti,mbox-send-noirq quirk to fix AM33xx CPU Idle

2015-10-22 Thread Suman Anna
On 10/21/2015 11:42 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: > On 22 October 2015 at 05:35, Suman Anna wrote: > >>> Anyways I am OK too, if you guys want to fix it with a platform >>> specific quirk. Let me know I'll pick this patch. >> >> I haven't gotten a chance to try #1, and I won't be able

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mailbox/omap: Add ti,mbox-send-noirq quirk to fix AM33xx CPU Idle

2015-10-21 Thread Jassi Brar
On 22 October 2015 at 05:35, Suman Anna wrote: >> Anyways I am OK too, if you guys want to fix it with a platform >> specific quirk. Let me know I'll pick this patch. > > I haven't gotten a chance to try #1, and I won't be able to look at it > atleast for another month. I

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mailbox/omap: Add ti,mbox-send-noirq quirk to fix AM33xx CPU Idle

2015-10-21 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Jassi, On 10/20/2015 11:44 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote: >> The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires >> either its controller implementations or clients to run the state >> machine for the Tx queue. The

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mailbox/omap: Add ti,mbox-send-noirq quirk to fix AM33xx CPU Idle

2015-10-20 Thread Jassi Brar
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote: > The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires > either its controller implementations or clients to run the state > machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox controller uses a Tx-ready > interrupt as

[PATCH v3 1/3] mailbox/omap: Add ti,mbox-send-noirq quirk to fix AM33xx CPU Idle

2015-09-22 Thread Dave Gerlach
The mailbox framework controls the transmission queue and requires either its controller implementations or clients to run the state machine for the Tx queue. The OMAP mailbox controller uses a Tx-ready interrupt as the equivalent of a Tx-done interrupt to run this Tx queue state-machine. The