Hi,
please break your lines at 80-characters. Also the [Hiremath, Vaibhav]
is unnecessary.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:58:42AM +0200, ext Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
don't you need some locking on the irq handler ? a mutex maybe ? Just
wondering...
[Hiremath, Vaibhav] Yes definitely we do need
Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2 1/3] RTC:s35390a: Add Alarm interrupt support
Hi,
please break your lines at 80-characters.
Normally I do take care of this, but missed this time. I will be more careful
in the future.
Also the [Hiremath, Vaibhav]
is unnecessary.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:58
)
Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2 1/3] RTC:s35390a: Add Alarm interrupt support
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:30:27PM +0200, ext hvaib...@ti.com wrote:
+static irqreturn_t s35390a_irq_thread(int irq, void *handle)
+{
+char buf[1];
+struct s35390a *s35390a = handle;
+struct i2c_client
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:30:27PM +0200, ext hvaib...@ti.com wrote:
+static irqreturn_t s35390a_irq_thread(int irq, void *handle)
+{
+ char buf[1];
+ struct s35390a *s35390a = handle;
+ struct i2c_client *client = s35390a-client[0];
don't you need some locking on the
