months.
Thank you,
Best regards,
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Trilok Soni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 10:14 AM
To: Kanigeri, Hari
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OMAP3 DSPBridge review
Hi Hari,
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Kanigeri
Hi Vijay,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Trilok Soni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vijay,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Pasam, Vijay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Trilok:
I was just going this dspbridge code, and I was surprised to
find layers for un-necessary
Hi Trilok:
TI has to decide, what path they have to follow now onwards for
bridge, I see no need of OSAL layer, when we are targeting this as
Linux kernel driver.
We are investigating the effort required to do this. We will get back on
this.
Thanks for the pointer on the
Hi Trilok:
I was just going this dspbridge code, and I was surprised to
find layers for un-necessary things, where we could have
simply called the linux kernel provided function. Here goes the list:
1. There is un-necessary linux directory inside mpu_driver
source codes. e.g
