Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Rainer Fuegenstein wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
This still looks odd, why should it behave like this. I have created
a lot of arrays (when I was doing the RAID5 speed testing thread),
and never had anything like this. I'd like to see dmesg to see if
-wheneverRainer Fuegenstein wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
This still looks odd, why should it behave like this. I have created
a lot of arrays (when I was doing the RAID5 speed testing thread),
and never had anything like this. I'd like to see dmesg to see if
there was an error reported regardi
Please see bellow.
On 8/28/06, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday August 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> well ... me again
>
> Following your advice
>
> I added a deadline for every WRITE stripe head when it is created.
> in raid5_activate_delayed i checked if deadline is expired
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Rainer Fuegenstein wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
This still looks odd, why should it behave like this. I have created a lot
of arrays (when I was doing the RAID5 speed testing thread), and never had
anything like this. I'd like to see dmesg to see if there was an error
re
Bill Davidsen wrote:
This still looks odd, why should it behave like this. I have created a
lot of arrays (when I was doing the RAID5 speed testing thread), and
never had anything like this. I'd like to see dmesg to see if there was
an error reported regarding this.
I think there's more goin
Neil Brown wrote:
On Saturday March 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Neil , I found the problem that caused the 'cannot allcate
memory' , DON'T use '--bitmap=' .
But that said , H , Shouldn't mdadm just stop & say ...
'md: bitmaps not supported for this level.'
Rainer Fuegenstein wrote:
hi,
1) the kernel was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux alfred 2.6.19-1.2288.fc5xen0 #1 SMP Sat Feb 10 16:57:02 EST 2007
i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
now upgraded to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux alfred 2.6.20-1.2307.fc5xen0 #1 SMP Sun Mar 18 21:59:42 EDT
hi,
1) the kernel was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux alfred 2.6.19-1.2288.fc5xen0 #1 SMP Sat Feb 10 16:57:02 EST 2007
i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
now upgraded to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux alfred 2.6.20-1.2307.fc5xen0 #1 SMP Sun Mar 18 21:59:42 EDT 2007
i686 athlon i386 GNU/
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday March 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay alive'?
echo
