Neil Brown wrote:
On Saturday March 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Neil , I found the problem that caused the 'cannot allcate
memory' , DON'T use '--bitmap=' .
But that said , Hmmmm , Shouldn't mdadm just stop & say ...
'md: bitmaps not supported for this level.'
Like it puts out into dmesg .
Also think this message in dmesg is interesting .
"raid0: bad disk number -1 - aborting!'
Hth , JimL
Yeah.... mdadm should be fixed too, but this kernel patch should make
it behave a bit better. I'll queue it for 2.6.22.
Given the release cycle, this might fit 2.6.21-rc6 (is is a fix), or
stable 2.6.21.1 if 21 comes out soon. In any case it could go in -mm for
testing and to be sure it would be pushed at an appropriate time.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Move test for whether level supports bitmap to correct place.
We need to check for internal-consistency of superblock in
load_super. validate_super is for inter-device consistency.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c 2007-03-29 16:42:18.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2007-03-29 16:49:26.000000000 +1000
@@ -695,6 +695,17 @@ static int super_90_load(mdk_rdev_t *rde
rdev->data_offset = 0;
rdev->sb_size = MD_SB_BYTES;
+ if (sb->state & (1<<MD_SB_BITMAP_PRESENT)) {
+ if (sb->level != 1 && sb->level != 4
+ && sb->level != 5 && sb->level != 6
+ && sb->level != 10) {
+ /* FIXME use a better test */
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "md: bitmaps not supported for this level.\n");
+ goto abort;
+ }
+ }
+
if (sb->level == LEVEL_MULTIPATH)
rdev->desc_nr = -1;
else
@@ -793,16 +804,8 @@ static int super_90_validate(mddev_t *md
mddev->max_disks = MD_SB_DISKS;
if (sb->state & (1<<MD_SB_BITMAP_PRESENT) &&
- mddev->bitmap_file == NULL) {
- if (mddev->level != 1 && mddev->level != 4
- && mddev->level != 5 && mddev->level != 6
- && mddev->level != 10) {
- /* FIXME use a better test */
- printk(KERN_WARNING "md: bitmaps not supported for
this level.\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ mddev->bitmap_file == NULL)
mddev->bitmap_offset = mddev->default_bitmap_offset;
- }
} else if (mddev->pers == NULL) {
/* Insist on good event counter while assembling */
@@ -1059,6 +1062,18 @@ static int super_1_load(mdk_rdev_t *rdev
bdevname(rdev->bdev,b));
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if ((le32_to_cpu(sb->feature_map) & MD_FEATURE_BITMAP_OFFSET)) {
+ if (sb->level != cpu_to_le32(1) &&
+ sb->level != cpu_to_le32(4) &&
+ sb->level != cpu_to_le32(5) &&
+ sb->level != cpu_to_le32(6) &&
+ sb->level != cpu_to_le32(10)) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "md: bitmaps not supported for this level.\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
rdev->preferred_minor = 0xffff;
rdev->data_offset = le64_to_cpu(sb->data_offset);
atomic_set(&rdev->corrected_errors,
le32_to_cpu(sb->cnt_corrected_read));
@@ -1142,14 +1157,9 @@ static int super_1_validate(mddev_t *mdd
mddev->max_disks = (4096-256)/2;
if ((le32_to_cpu(sb->feature_map) & MD_FEATURE_BITMAP_OFFSET) &&
- mddev->bitmap_file == NULL ) {
- if (mddev->level != 1 && mddev->level != 5 &&
mddev->level != 6
- && mddev->level != 10) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "md: bitmaps not supported for
this level.\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ mddev->bitmap_file == NULL )
mddev->bitmap_offset =
(__s32)le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
- }
+
if ((le32_to_cpu(sb->feature_map) & MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE))
{
mddev->reshape_position =
le64_to_cpu(sb->reshape_position);
mddev->delta_disks = le32_to_cpu(sb->delta_disks);
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
