Subject: Re: Question: array locking, possible?
It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a
feature.
Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-)
Regards,
Chris
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 21:45:33 +0100
Jure Peèar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:55:49 +0100
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Osicki
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:13 AM
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: array locking, possible?
Rick
On HP-UX disk mirroring is done in LVM. I'm using md driver for
mirroring and LVM on top of it. Controlling access to my disks
Luca
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:48:48 +0100
Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Stern, Rick (Serviceguard Linux)
wrote:
There is more interest, just not vocal.
May want to look at LVM2 and its ability to use tagging to control
enablement of VGs.
,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Osicki
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:13 AM
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: array locking, possible?
Rick
On HP-UX disk mirroring is done in LVM. I'm using
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 06:52:47PM +0100, Chris Osicki wrote:
Luca
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:48:48 +0100
Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Stern, Rick (Serviceguard Linux)
wrote:
There is more interest, just not vocal.
May want to look at LVM2 and
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:53:43PM +0100, Luca Berra wrote:
diff -urN mdadm-2.3.1/Assemble.c mdadm-2.3.1.exclusive/Assemble.c
please note that the patch was written while i was composing the email
as a proof-of-concept, it should not be considered working (or even
compiling code)
L.
--
Luca
Jure Pečar wrote:
I too am running a jbod with md raid between two machines. So far md never
caused any kind of problems, altough I did have situations where both
machines were syncing mirrors at once.
If there's a little tool to reserve a disk via scsi, I'd like to know about
it too. Even a
It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a
feature.
Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-)
Regards,
Chris
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 21:45:33 +0100
Jure Peèar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:55:49 +0100
Chris Osicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was
2:26 AM
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: array locking, possible?
It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a
feature.
Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-)
Regards,
Chris
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 21:45:33 +0100
Jure Peèar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Stern, Rick (Serviceguard Linux)
wrote:
There is more interest, just not vocal.
May want to look at LVM2 and its ability to use tagging to control enablement
of VGs. This way it is not HW dependent.
I believe there is space in md1 superblock for a
On Thursday February 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a
feature.
Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-)
:-)
Just because I haven't said anything doesn't mean I'm not listening.
Cluster awareness is definitely on my radar. I have
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:16:20 -0800
Mike Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Osicki wrote:
To rephrase my question, is there any way to make it visible to the
other host that the array is up an running on the this host?
Any comments, ideas?
Would that not imply an unlock
I was thinking about it, I have no idea how to do it on Linux if ever possible.
I connect over fibre channel SAN, using QLogic QLA2312 HBAS, if it matters.
Anyone any hints?
Thanks and regards,
Chris
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:26:13 -0500
Paul Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Osicki
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:55:49 +0100
Chris Osicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about it, I have no idea how to do it on Linux if ever
possible.
I connect over fibre channel SAN, using QLogic QLA2312 HBAS, if it matters.
Anyone any hints?
I too am running a jbod with md raid
Chris Osicki wrote:
To rephrase my question, is there any way to make it visible to the
other host that the array is up an running on the this host?
Any comments, ideas?
Would that not imply an unlock command before you could run the array
on the other host?
Would that not then break
Chris Osicki wrote:
The problem now is how to prevent somebody on the other host from
accidentally assembling the array. Because the result of doing so would
be something from strange to catastrophic ;-)
To rephrase my question, is there any way to make it visible to the
other host that the
16 matches
Mail list logo
