It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a
feature.
Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-)
Regards,
Chris
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 21:45:33 +0100
Jure Peèar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:55:49 +0100
Chris Osicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was
Oh yeah, it's possible - I've done it in connection with disaster
recovery (or rather, attempt thereof).
The key is to write 'missing' instead of the device name, so you just go
mdadm -C /dev/md0 --raid-level=5 --raid-devices=3 /dev/hdxx /dev/hdyy
missing
-note that the missing drive can
Hello Patrik ,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Patrik Jonsson wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
I always make them against the latest -mm kernel, so that would be a
good place to start. However things change quickly and I can't
promise it will apply against whatever is the 'latest' today.
If you would
There is more interest, just not vocal.
May want to look at LVM2 and its ability to use tagging to control enablement
of VGs. This way it is not HW dependent.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Osicki
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Stern, Rick (Serviceguard Linux)
wrote:
There is more interest, just not vocal.
May want to look at LVM2 and its ability to use tagging to control enablement
of VGs. This way it is not HW dependent.
I believe there is space in md1 superblock for a
On Thursday February 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a
feature.
Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-)
:-)
Just because I haven't said anything doesn't mean I'm not listening.
Cluster awareness is definitely on my radar. I have
