Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] [BUG] Raid1/5 over iSCSI trouble

2007-10-19 Thread Ming Zhang
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 23:04 +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote: BERTRAND Joël wrote: BERTRAND Joël wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 01:04 -0700, BERTRAND Joël wrote: I run for 12 hours some dd's (read and write in nullio) between initiator

RE: [Iscsitarget-devel] [BUG] Raid1/5 over iSCSI trouble

2007-10-19 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
BERTRAND Joël wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: BERTRAND Joël wrote: BERTRAND Joël wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 01:04 -0700, BERTRAND Joël wrote: I run for 12 hours some dd's (read and write in nullio) between initiator and

Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] [BUG] Raid1/5 over iSCSI trouble

2007-10-19 Thread Scott Kaelin
[snip] I am unsure why you would want to setup an iSCSI RAID1, but before doing so I would try to verify that each independant iSCSI session is bullet proof. I use one and only one iSCSI session. Raid1 array is built between a local and iSCSI volume. So you only get this

RE: [Iscsitarget-devel] [BUG] Raid1/5 over iSCSI trouble

2007-10-19 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
BERTRAND Joël wrote: BERTRAND Joël wrote: BERTRAND Joël wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 01:04 -0700, BERTRAND Joël wrote: I run for 12 hours some dd's (read and write in nullio) between initiator and target without any