At 9:23 AM +0300 2001-06-17, Jaakko Hyvätti wrote:
What is a sysadmin thinking when something is wrong with the raid array
he installed two years ago, and he has forgotten what is the name of the
driver and everything about it? He thinks 'how can I check about this
RAID stuff? How about some
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
If the admin doesn't remember the name of the command,
she's not likely to remember the options, and it's hard to do a man
lookup on raid-something. (Or has the Linux man command progressed
beyond what I'm familiar with?)
Do you mean that?
#
,x203
http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations
http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page
FAX 321-676-2355
- Original Message -
From: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux RAID Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: mdctl - names and code
raidctl is already used in the BSD camp.
RAIDCTL(8) NetBSD System Manager's Manual RAIDCTL(8)
NAME
raidctl - configuration utility for the RAIDframe disk driver
Neil Brown wrote:
Thankyou for all the suggestions for names for mdctl.
We have
raidctl
Thankyou for all the suggestions for names for mdctl.
We have
raidctl raidctrl
swraidctl
mdtools mdutils
mdmanage mdmgr mdmd:-) mdcfg mdconfig mdadmin
Mike Black suggested that it is valuable for tools that are related to
start with a common prefix so that command completion can be used
swraidctl - yes, it is long, but is it much longer than apachectl? No, it is
exactly the same length. It is much more descriptive than raidctl as it
specifies that this is software raid, and it is more obvious than mdctl. I
know I and others I work with were generally confused at first
]
To: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Friedrich Lobenstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Linux RAID Mailing Liste
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: mdctl
swraidctl - yes, it is long, but is it much longer than apachectl? No, it is
exactly the same length. It is much more
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Micah Anderson wrote:
swraidctl - yes, it is long, but is it much longer than apachectl? No, it is
exactly the same length. It is much more descriptive than raidctl as it
specifies that this is software raid, and it is more obvious than mdctl. I
know I and others I
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Mike Black wrote:
Need:
raidmk (instead of mkraid)
raidmdctl
Why raid+md? Either stick with md or with raid.
If we asume that all commands should start with raid, I'd like
to see a
raidctl
or
raidctrl
command, not a raidmdctl!
Just my 2 euro cents :)
--
MfG /
On Friday June 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
If you don't like the name mdctl (I don't), please suggest another.
How about raidctrl?
Possible... though I don't think it is much better. Longer to type too:-)
I kind of like having the md
: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:10 AM
Subject: mdctl aka ...
At 10:31 AM +1000 2001-06-12, Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday June 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
If you don't like the name mdctl (I don't), please suggest
another.
How about raidctrl?
Possible
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
If you don't like the name mdctl (I don't), please suggest another.
How about raidctrl?
--
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo