Benno,
On Fri, 07 Jan 2000 13:07:16 +0100, Benno Senoner wrote:
I was wondering if this procedure (swapping on Raid1 + waiting for the resync),
is safe on an IDE only system ?
I don't need hot-swapping, the only thing I need is that if one disk dies,
swapping will not take down the disk (hangs
Ingo,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:14:07 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar wrote:
I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
together with kernel 2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE
drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx) the kernel panics with "B_FREE
inserted into queues"
Hi,
I just wanted to warn everybody not to use raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 together with
kernel
2.2.14: at least in my configuration (two IDE drives with RAID-1, root on /dev/mdx)
the
kernel panics with "B_FREE inserted into queues" at boot time.
This seems to be some kind of a known problem,
James,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 08:26:19 -0800 (PST), Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
I vote for maintaining the Doc's , [...]
And do you volunteer to? :-)
Regards,
Robert
David,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:03:35 -0800, David Cunningham wrote:
Here's the situation. I've read the Howto. I've got 2 EIDE disks running
RAID-1 under Redhat 6.0. The partition types are fd, the kernel option for
autodetecting RAID is set, and md0 was built with persistent superblock.
Here
Chris,
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 21:40:37 +0100, KS wrote:
We just had some memory added in our server that is on some remote location.
The guy also switched the disks that were in the raid1.
He connected them to wrong cables, when he realised that sth is wrong,
he connected them like before and as
Luis,
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:00:43 -0500 (EST), Luis Costabile wrote:
Thanks Robert. I'm now able to boot from the boot partition of the
second drive.
Well, that's what we wanted. :-)
One question, where do you find out that sdb is supposed to be bios=0x80
what about sda ?
sdb becomes
Stephen,
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:05:19 -0800 (PST), Stephen Walton wrote:
Well I'm a new convert to software RAID on Linux. The system I'm
presently using is a P-150 with Adaptec 2940 SCSI controller, single SCSI
hard disk which is the boot drive, and a new pair of Western Digital
Caviar 20.5
Luis,
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:49:07 -0500 (EST), Luis Costabile wrote:
Hello, I installed root as a mirrored volume. I have two SCSI disks only
in the system. According to the HOWTO it's suggested to have /boot reside
on a separate partition on each disk. I installed the kernels and other
Jakob,
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 19:55:56 +0100, Jakob stergaard wrote:
After a change you can mkraid the array again, and if you have an ext2
filesystem on it, you can probably use ext2resize to resize that to fit
the new size of the array. Note however, that ext2resize only supports
*growing*
Matt,
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:18:37 -0500, Matt Kimmel wrote:
I am running a RAID-1 mirror set of two disks on our Linux server here. A couple of
weeks ago, one of the mirrors went bad. While waiting for a replacement, I ran the
mirror with a single drive, which worked fine. However, now
Michel,
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 10:24:15 -0500, Michel Pelletier wrote:
physical? The other two partions on the same drive work dandy with
their RAID, it looks like just this one partition on the
drive is bad.
How, in a nutshell, do I fix this sucker?
try raidhotremove /dev/mdx
Michel,
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:00:36 -0500, Michel Pelletier wrote:
physical? The other two partions on the same drive work
dandy with
their RAID, it looks like just this one partition on the
drive is bad.
How, in a nutshell, do I fix this sucker?
try raidhotremove /dev/mdx
13 matches
Mail list logo
