bonjour ,
J'ai installe MDUTILS sous Suse 6.1 et me sert du support QuickStart.RAID pour
mettre en oeuvre le raid1.
je ne trouve pas le fichier raid1.conf.sample ni la commande configure.
pouvez vous m'aider ?
essayez les raidtools-0.90 vous pouvez trouver dans tous les
kernel-mirreurs ftp://ftp.fr.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/
ici vous trouvez les patches pour le kernel le trop actuel et les
raidtools.
lire Software-RAID.HOWTO/Software-RAID.HOWTO.txt dans les nouvelles
raidtools.
ludo
Even I manually inserted raid0 module or recompiled the kernel to have
raid0 built-in, the same problem still happened.
What else should I do?
Ekasit K.
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Bruno Prior wrote:
Also, /proc/mdstat has no change:
Personalities :
read_ahead not set
md0 : inactive
md1 :
Even I manually inserted raid0 module or recompiled the kernel to have
raid0 built-in, the same problem still happened.
What else should I do?
You mean /proc/mdstat still shows no personalities registered after you insert
the raid0 module? Strange. As before, please tell us what kernel
I'm running the 2.0.38 kernel with the 19990824 patches and tools (0.90) and
trying to set up raid1 for a production system.
/proc/mdstat shows;
Personalities :
read_ahead 131072 sectors
unused devices: none
I'm running raid1 support as a module and when I do insmod raid1.o I get;
ludo wrote:
bonjour ,
J'ai un systeme avec deux disques SDA et SDB
Mon systeme est defini de la facon suivante :
/dev/sda1/
/dev/sda2/usr
/dev/sda3/opt
/dev/sda4partition etendue
/dev/sda5/home (partition logique)
/dev/sda6swap (partition logique)
Sdb
I think you meant 'if you're NOT really concerned about performance.'
The benchmarks I've seen for array controllers come nowhere near the
performance of a software-based array on a simple SMP server. For one
thing, the processor on, say, a DPT or ICP RAID controller is nowhere
near as powerful
Marc SCHAEFER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going to try with raw IO (with sct patch) to see if it's the
memcpy_to_fs() (or 2.x equivalent) which is responsible for the slow down.
I am also going to try with two QLOGIC ISP1080 since they seem even faster
than the AIC7895 which was already
| I think you meant 'if you're NOT really concerned about performance.'
| The benchmarks I've seen for array controllers come nowhere near the
| performance of a software-based array on a simple SMP server. For one
| thing, the processor on, say, a DPT or ICP RAID controller is nowhere
| near as
j'ai fait un erreur.. je vais me corrigier dans le texte suivante.
Andreas Gietl wrote:
ludo wrote:
bonjour ,
J'ai un systeme avec deux disques SDA et SDB
Mon systeme est defini de la facon suivante :
/dev/sda1/
/dev/sda2/usr
/dev/sda3/opt
/dev/sda4
I stand corrected. Most of the benchmarks I was referencing were for
dual 300MHz Intel SMP systems or better as dedicated fileservers. I
presume there are numerous servers out there that are not lucky enough
to only have to serve NFS shares and/or are using non SMP boards with
older/slower
As I mentioned in my original note, the system is a dual PIII-500
system that will be dedicated as a file server. So there is plenty
of cpu grunt to service a software RAID. I agree that the performance
numbers seem to lean heavily in favour of software RAID over the
currently available
Hello Everyone,
I was wondering if someone could verify that I have to patch the RH 6.0
kernel to correctly configure and setup a RAID 1 array. The reason for
my question is because I've setup a RAID 1 array by installing the raidtools
0.90 rpm package only. Out of the box the RH 6.0 seemed to
go to this adress http://www.t-king.de/
linux softwareraid
!!! il faut comprendre l'allemand.
At 18:55 03.09.99 +0200, Daniel Wirth wrote:
be careful, it does not make any sense to have several partitions of the
same harddisk in the same raid:
device /dev/sdb1
raid-disk
We've found we have to rename /etc/raidtab to something else.
Haven't really figured out why.
Larry
At 10:56 AM 9/3/99 -0600, you wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was wondering if someone could verify that I have to patch the RH 6.0
kernel to correctly configure and setup a RAID 1 array. The reason
15 matches
Mail list logo