Michael wrote:
According to the RAID HOWTO
(www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Root-RAID-HOWTO-2.html) you are supposed to
have the following packages:
This document is obsolete. See the Sequel at:
ftp://ftp.bizsystems.net/pub/raid/Boot+Root+Raid+LILO.html
I've seen this URL several times
Hi all,
i have raid 0 setup in my box, and today i have a strange problem.
I compiled kernel 2.2.16, included all RAID[0,1,2,3,4] as modules, cretaed
an initrd image (mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.2.16-10.img 2.2.16-10) and
rebooted.
The system, under no circumstances booted. It complained about
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 03:20:58PM +0300, Dimitrios Stergiou wrote:
I compiled kernel 2.2.16, included all RAID[0,1,2,3,4] as modules, cretaed
an initrd image (mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.2.16-10.img 2.2.16-10) and
rebooted.
The system, under no circumstances booted. It complained about "md0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, I'm trying to install RAID1 on a SuSE box.
The box has two identical 20-ish GB disks in it, ATA/66. SuSE is
installed on /dev/hda (in various partitions: /boot / /var and so on).
According to the Software-RAID HOWTO, I can create a RAID
you must patch your kernel with the latest raidcode for this to work. you are
using a kernel with the old raidcode in it, but trying to use the new tools on
it.
get latest tools and raid patches from www.redhat.com/~mingo/
apply patch, build new kernel with the raid levels you need built in
According to the RAID HOWTO
(www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Root-RAID-HOWTO-2.html) you are supposed to
have the following packages:
This document is obsolete. See the Sequel at:
ftp://ftp.bizsystems.net/pub/raid/Boot+Root+Raid+LILO.html
I've seen this URL several times before but
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Marc Mutz wrote:
Look, you are an the _very_ wrong track! You may have 6 or 7 PCI
_slots_, but you have only _one_ bus, i.e. only 133MB/sec bandwidth for
_all_ 6 or 7 devices. You will not get 90MB/sec real throughput with a
bus bandwidth of
Enough with the vulgarities. This doesn't really belong on the RAID list
any longer, but I'll make a few points below.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The alphas we have here have the same number of slots.
But not only one bus. They typically
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
http://www.compaq.com/alphaserver/gs80/index.html This isn't even the top
of the line Alpha, but it has 16 (that's F in hex, or 20 in octal) PCI
busses. Again, you PAY for that kind of machine.
That machine costs around US$2million.
-Dan
Hi Everybody,
I need some help in configuring Raid based mirroring on a HP Netserver
LH4 (Intel based) system running Red Hat Linux 6.2 (Kernel ver.
2.2.14-5.0smp).
This system has a 9 GB disc, on which the OS has been loaded. Also,
there are 2 identical 36 GB discs, which have been configured
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
I managed to reproduce this and, at least for me, it is caused by a
deadlock when kflushd tries to write out data via raid1, raid1 tries
to allocate memory, which blocks waiting for kflushd to free up some
memory.
Hmm.. This is actually what
Hello all,
when I buy an ide hardware raid card, and I want run it on
linux, I need linux driver to use it?
Gosh, you made abitof a mess
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:59:11AM -0700, Vivek Singh wrote:
I installed Linux on the system. Now when the system boots up, I cannot see
either of the 36 GB discs. The raidtools utility (ver 0.90) was installed
yes, they are already mirrored you see only 1 36G
Hi,
I've created mirrored striped arrays (Raid10) and am not confident that
my first striped set is in fact being mirrored on my second striped set.
When the mirrored mdX devices are created, cat /proc/mdstat does show
that re-synching is taking place. However, if I mount an mdX that is
part
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I managed to reproduce this and, at least for me, it is caused by a
deadlock when kflushd tries to write out data via raid1, raid1 tries
to allocate memory, which blocks waiting for kflushd to free up some
memory.
Hmm.. This is actually what
Hi Group,
I cannot get 2.2.13-16 to complete a compile. It has all kinds
of missing references, unititialized variables, etc...
I am able to compile and run 2.0.38 patched w/ megaraid
patches.
Has anyone had success or any ideas?!?
TIA - Andy
Andrew B. Cramer - [EMAIL
On 18 Jul 2000, at 21:03, Andrew B. Cramer wrote:
Hi Group,
I cannot get 2.2.13-16 to complete a compile. It has all kinds
of missing references, unititialized variables, etc...
Has anyone had success or any ideas?!?
Upgrade your kernel - the Megaraid driver was updated in
On Tuesday July 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
I managed to reproduce this and, at least for me, it is caused by a
deadlock when kflushd tries to write out data via raid1, raid1 tries
to allocate memory, which blocks waiting for kflushd to
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
When you made the initrd, did you do "--with=raid0"? (and any other raid
levels you need for the root drive)?
yeap, actually i tried once with:
mkinitrd --with=raid0
and once with:
mkinitrd --ifneeded
i also tried to compile raid0 in the kernel and
19 matches
Mail list logo
