yself into
the future." --Kraftwerk, 1981
--
From: Theo Van Dinter[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: partition size limit
[clip]
and if you're really
| I think you meant 'if you're NOT really concerned about performance.'
| The benchmarks I've seen for array controllers come nowhere near the
| performance of a software-based array on a simple SMP server. For one
| thing, the processor on, say, a DPT or ICP RAID controller is nowhere
| near as
yself into
the future." --Kraftwerk, 1981
--
From: Kenneth Cornetet[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 11:20 AM
To: 'Stanley, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: partition size limit
[clip]
I have tried the DPT SmartRaid IV card
To: 'Stanley, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: partition size limit
[clip]
I have tried the DPT SmartRaid IV card (680X0 CPU, if memory serves)
and it is a DOG performance wise. Using 4 18GB Barracudas (10k RPM) in
RAID5 under Linux or NT I get about 3 MB/sec writes and 8
I'm in the process of setting up a system for my company and need a bit
of advice. We'd like to have a huge flat filesystem connected to a dual
processor RH 6.0 system. I've got a dual PIII-500 system with 256mb RAM
and dual Adaptec LVD scsi controllers. I was planning to plop the OS
on a
I'm also interested in this topic. I'm going to setup RAID-1 over 36GB
disks in a single partition. Is there any problem with the size of disks?
TIA,
Gerry.
Chris Mauritz wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a system for my
company and need a bit
of advice. We'd like to have a huge flat
