Andrea Arcangeli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 7 August 2000 16:50:
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Does this patch allow raid5 over raid0? That'd be really wonderful...
Despite it's useful nor not, which 2.?.x?
The latest if possible, but the one your patch applies to if I have
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
So can't this be fixed?
Everything can be fixed, the fact is that I'm not sure if it worth, we'd
better spend efforts in making 2.4.x more stable than overbackporting
new stuff to 2.2.x... The fix precisely to allow raid5 on raid0 could be
pretty
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Carvalho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 10:57 AM
To: Andrea Arcangeli
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: raid-2.2.17-A0 cleanup for LVM
In 2.2.x that's not possible but for _very_ silly reasons.
So can't this be fixed
Andrea Arcangeli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 3 August 2000 19:55:
On Aug 2, 7:12pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
} Subject: raid-2.2.17-A0 cleanup for LVM
This patch cleanups the new raid code so that we have a chance that LVM on
top of RAID will keep working. It's untested at the moment.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 6 21:45:04 2000
Andrea Arcangeli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 3 August 2000 19:55:
On Aug 2, 7:12pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
} Subject: raid-2.2.17-A0 cleanup for LVM
This patch cleanups the new raid code so that we have a chance that LVM on
top
On Aug 2, 7:12pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
} Subject: raid-2.2.17-A0 cleanup for LVM
This patch cleanups the new raid code so that we have a chance that LVM on
top of RAID will keep working. It's untested at the moment.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, G.W. Wettstein wrote:
On Aug 2, 7:12pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
} Subject: raid-2.2.17-A0 cleanup for LVM
This patch cleanups the new raid code so that we have a chance that LVM on
top of RAID will keep working. It's untested at the moment.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, G.W. Wettstein wrote:
Grab 2.2.15aa1 or 2.2.17pre11aa2, they have completly reliable LVM (I also
switch between it and 2.4.x stock without changing anything). It can be
used for production. You can find the
