On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:19:41PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> So what is the consensus here? Should we leave it alone for now and
> potentially go back and deal with this separately? Just define the new one
> as LE and use it, even though it doesn't match the rest? Something else
> entir
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:55:11PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:24:55PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> > /* A multicast address requ
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:24:55PM -0500, ira.weiny wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> > > /* A multicast address requires a GRH (see ch. 8.4.1). */
> > > - if (ah_attr->dlid >= QIB_MU
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> > /* A multicast address requires a GRH (see ch. 8.4.1). */
> > - if (ah_attr->dlid >= QIB_MULTICAST_LID_BASE &&
> > - ah_attr->dlid != QIB_PERMISSIVE
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> /* A multicast address requires a GRH (see ch. 8.4.1). */
> - if (ah_attr->dlid >= QIB_MULTICAST_LID_BASE &&
> - ah_attr->dlid != QIB_PERMISSIVE_LID &&
> + if (ah_attr->dlid >= be16_to_cpu(IB_MULTICAST_LID_B
Original patch for AH changes from Kamal Heib , split
apart from original. This patch also removes the qib specific multicast
lid base and permissive lid defines since they are no longer needed.
Use common LID defines in qib driver.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny
Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib
Signed-off-by
