Hi Mark
> > dw-hdmi-audio.c : dw-hdmi audio common function set
> > dw-hdmi-ahb-audio.c : dw-hdmi audio for ahb, using dw-hdmi-audio.c
> > dw-hdmi-soc-audio.c : dw-hdmi audio for ASoC, using dw-hdmi-audio.c
>
> Something similar has been done for other things like the PXA drivers
Hi Wolfram,
On Monday 18 Apr 2016 11:33:20 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Whether we want a clock to influence its parent is policy, not hardware
> > description. So IMHO it doesn't belong in DT.
>
> Yeah, I agree to that.
>
> > IMHO it's more worthwhile to convert r8a7740 to use the CPG/MSSR driver.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:45:41AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> Current simple-card is using "sound-dai" base connection on DT,
> but V4L2 is using graph base connection.
> For example HDMI case, we would like to use both connection.
> To above confusable connection method, and
Same as on r8a7791.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
index 6843f46..aea9294
Includes regulator and pin assignments.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts | 119 +
1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
This enables SDHI on the Gose board, including pins and regulators.
This revision includes the missing dma-names and power-domains entries
spotted by Sergei and Simon.
CU
Uli
Ulrich Hecht (2):
ARM: dts: r8a7793: Add SDHI controllers
ARM: dts: gose: Enable SDHI controllers
On 18 April 2016 at 15:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
+
+static bool
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>
> I am interested to know why this is always returning true. Perhaps you
> can elaborate a bit on that?
[...]
> +
> +static bool rcar_sysc_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return true;
I am interested to know why this is always returning true. Perhaps you
can elaborate a bit on that?
> +}
> +
> +static int rcar_sysc_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> +{
> +
Hi Ulrich,
This isn't right: this just overwrites the adv7180 input with an HDMI input.
I assume the intention is to have support for both adv7180 and HDMI input and
to use VIDIOC_S_INPUT to select between the two.
This really needs some more work, I'm afraid.
Regards,
Hans
On
Hi Niklas,
Thanks for the patch. I've been testing this a bit more and there are a
few things missing.
On 04/12/2016 04:33 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index
> Whether we want a clock to influence its parent is policy, not hardware
> description. So IMHO it doesn't belong in DT.
Yeah, I agree to that.
> IMHO it's more worthwhile to convert r8a7740 to use the CPG/MSSR driver.
> There it can be handled easily by adding a flag to the mssr_mod_clk
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> The wrong values come from an old datasheet. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
On 6 April 2016 at 11:25, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> There is no user left in the kernel, so this code can be removed.
> (Legacy, non-DT sh_mobile boards have been removed a while ago.) The
> diff looks more complicated than
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Hence I think it should be handled in the driver.
>
> I knew it ;)
>
> If we change the MSTP driver, we should do it in a generic way. MSTP
> clocks which should/should not change the parent's clock rate can
> Hence I think it should be handled in the driver.
I knew it ;)
If we change the MSTP driver, we should do it in a generic way. MSTP
clocks which should/should not change the parent's clock rate can be
anywhere. My best bet so far would be encoding this in DT, because all
the heuristics I
Since usbhsf_dma_{un}map() will use the "fifo" data in the near future,
this patch changes function call orfer in usbhsf_dma_prepare_push().
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda
---
drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/fifo.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6
The previous code could use the first USB-DMAC with IPMMU if iommus
property was set into this device node. However, in this case, it
could not control the second USB-DMAC with IPMMU because a parameter
of IPMMU (micro-TLB id) is different with each USB-DMAC.
So, this patch uses the
Since usbhsg_dma_map_ctrl() needs DMA device structure in the near future,
this patch changes arguments of dma_map_ctrl() to give such data.
(This patch is only change the argument.)
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda
---
drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/fifo.c |
If the following environment, the first argument of DMA API should
be set to a DMAC's device structure, not a udc controller's one.
- A udc controller needs an external DMAC device (like a DMA Engine).
- The external DMAC enables IOMMU.
So, this patch add usb_gadget_{un}map_request_by_dev() API
The argument of dev_err() in usb_gadget_map_request() should be dev
instead of >dev.
Fixes: 7ace8fc ("usb: gadget: udc: core: Fix argument of dma_map_single for
IOMMU")
Cc: # v4.3+
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda
---
This patch set is based on the latest Felipe's usb.git / testing/next
branch. (The commit id = 578bfe42fc37d588effe0d9fcd5e35e10d3d2e78)
Changes from RFC:
- rebase the latest commit of Felipe's usb.git.
- revise commit log in patch 3 and 4.
About the RFC patch set:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 02:43:21 +
Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> But can I ask something ?
>
> > > > My concern is if audio side need to care/support "formal" graph style,
> > > > I think all cpu/codec/card driver (and soc-core too ?) need to be
> > > > updated,
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> > > That seems like a bug in the clock driver. If it doesn't have
>> > > independent dividers for each clock client then it shouldn't allow any
>> > >
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Can you please give more detail about this r8a7740 issue? Just
>> "r8a7740 flaw" does not make me understand.
>
> Ah, sorry. This RFC series was merely meant as a "right direction?"
> series for Geert, thus
> Can you please give more detail about this r8a7740 issue? Just
> "r8a7740 flaw" does not make me understand.
Ah, sorry. This RFC series was merely meant as a "right direction?"
series for Geert, thus the short CC list. The full series will have
better documentation.
The flaw is: On r8a7740,
26 matches
Mail list logo