On 06/13/2018 01:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
[...]
But wait, since we control which machines this code runs on , can't we
assure they have valid DTs ? This situation with invalid DT starts to
look a bit hypothetical to me.
>>>
>>> That assumes you keep the
On 06/11/2018 04:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:19 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/11/2018 04:10 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:04 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/11/2018 03:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon,
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:19 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 04:10 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:04 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 06/11/2018 03:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:04 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 03:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:15 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On
On 06/11/2018 03:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:15 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/11/2018 11:56 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:15 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 06/11/2018 11:56 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:59 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> Rather
On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:15 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/11/2018 11:56 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:59 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:15 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 11:56 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:59 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
> >> parse the information from DT. The code looks for
On 06/11/2018 11:56 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:59 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
>> parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
>> PMICs -- da9036 and da9210 -- and
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:59 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
> parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
> PMICs -- da9036 and da9210 -- and checks if their IRQ line is tied
da9063
> to the same pin. If
On 06/05/2018 10:07 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
>> parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
>> PMICs -- da9036 and da9210 -- and checks if their
On 06/05/2018 11:21 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
>>> parse the information from DT. The
Hi Marek,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:07:28AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
> > parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
> > PMICs -- da9036
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
> parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
> PMICs -- da9036 and da9210 -- and checks if their IRQ line is tied
> to the same pin. If so, the
Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
PMICs -- da9036 and da9210 -- and checks if their IRQ line is tied
to the same pin. If so, the code sends a matching sequence to the
PMIC to deassert the IRQ.
15 matches
Mail list logo