On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> On group configuration, bail out if setting one of the individual pins
> fails. We don't need to roll-back, the pinctrl core will do this for us.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi Wolfram,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> This is caused by the "output-high" property for the GPIO hog.
>> Due to both lcd0 pinmux and GPIO hog being part of the same device node,
>> "output-high" is also applied to the lcd0 pins, which fails.
>>
>>
Hi Geert,
> This is caused by the "output-high" property for the GPIO hog.
> Due to both lcd0 pinmux and GPIO hog being part of the same device node,
> "output-high" is also applied to the lcd0 pins, which fails.
>
> RFC fix in "[PATCH/RFC] ARM: dts: armadillo800eva: Split LCD mux and gpio"
>
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On group configuration, bail out if setting one of the individual pins
>> fails. We don't need to roll-back, the pinctrl
> > On group configuration, bail out if setting one of the individual pins
> > fails. We don't need to roll-back, the pinctrl core will do this for us.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> > ---
> >
> > Tested on a Lager and Salvator-X without problems. Needs
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On group configuration, bail out if setting one of the individual pins
> fails. We don't need to roll-back, the pinctrl core will do this for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
From: Wolfram Sang
On group configuration, bail out if setting one of the individual pins
fails. We don't need to roll-back, the pinctrl core will do this for us.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
Tested on a Lager and