Hi Geert,
On Friday, July 13, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > There is an ID register in RZ/A2 that will have a different number for
> > each silicon.
> > See the first entry in Table 5.6 (BSID register).
> >
> > Technically, it's not "PRR" like it's SH/R-Car devices. It's actually
> > the
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:50 PM Chris Brandt wrote:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > As the IP cores are the same in all variants, using
> > "renesas,r7s9210-" should be fine for matching drivers to IP
> > cores. Same for CONFIG_ARCH_R7S9210.
> >
> > However,
Hi Geert,
On Thursday, July 12, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> As the IP cores are the same in all variants, using
> "renesas,r7s9210-" should be fine for matching drivers to IP
> cores. Same for CONFIG_ARCH_R7S9210.
>
> However, as the actual dies differ between H, M, and L versions, there
Hi Geert,
On Thursday, July 12, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> As the IP cores are the same in all variants, using
> "renesas,r7s9210-" should be fine for matching drivers to IP
> cores. Same for CONFIG_ARCH_R7S9210.
>
> However, as the actual dies differ between H, M, and L versions, there
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:15 PM Chris Brandt wrote:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > + - RZ/A2 (R7S9210)
> > > +compatible = "renesas,r7s9210"
> >
> > There seems to be a difference between the r7s92104x and the r7s92105x
> > parts (with "x" just
Hi Geert,
On Thursday, July 12, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > + - RZ/A2 (R7S9210)
> > +compatible = "renesas,r7s9210"
>
> There seems to be a difference between the r7s92104x and the r7s92105x
> parts (with "x" just denoting a different packaging)?
> Do we need one more digit?
From
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:02 AM Chris Brandt wrote:
> Add device tree bindings documentation for Renesas RZ/A2 (r7s9210) SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt
> +++
