On Saturday 22 November 2014 06:18 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say
so if there are reasons I should take them.
I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver.
Yes, those
On Friday 21 November 2014 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will
help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and
will help in removing static iomapping
I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say
so if there are reasons I should take them.
I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver.
Yes, those should absolutely go via my I2C tree. You need to make a
seperate patch out of the dts changes
Pankaj Dubey wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2014 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will
help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and
will help
Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say
so if there are reasons I should take them.
I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver.
Yes, those should absolutely go via my I2C tree. You need to make a
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will
help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and
will help in removing static iomapping of SYS register in exynos.c
Since only Exynos5250, and
