On 10/02/2012 10:06 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/30/2012 11:29 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>>> Hello Stephen Warren,
>>>
>>> The binding names that I use in my dts file should match with the
>>> names given in
>>> http://li
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/30/2012 11:29 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>> Hello Stephen Warren,
>>
>> The binding names that I use in my dts file should match with the
>> names given in
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/024875.html
On 09/30/2012 11:29 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
> Hello Stephen Warren,
>
> The binding names that I use in my dts file should match with the
> names given in
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/024875.html
> right?
I don't think so; the binding in that link is for e
Hello Stephen Warren,
The binding names that I use in my dts file should match with the
names given in
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/024875.html
right?
I think that is the only thing I have to take care, and as I'm not
using "struct drm_display_mode" in my driver its
2012/9/26 Mark Brown :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:03:44AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>> 2012/9/25 Laurent Pinchart :
>
>> > Aren't DT bindings considered as an ABI, and required to be supported more
>> > or
>> > less forever ? If you merge this DT binding you'll have to keep supporting
>> > it.
>>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:03:44AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2012/9/25 Laurent Pinchart :
> > Aren't DT bindings considered as an ABI, and required to be supported more
> > or
> > less forever ? If you merge this DT binding you'll have to keep supporting
> > it.
> > That's why DT bindings should
2012/9/25 Laurent Pinchart :
> On Monday 24 September 2012 21:35:46 Inki Dae wrote:
>> 2012/9/22 Stephen Warren :
>> > On 09/21/2012 01:22 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> >> 2012/9/21 Stephen Warren :
>> >>> On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree based disco
On Monday 24 September 2012 21:35:46 Inki Dae wrote:
> 2012/9/22 Stephen Warren :
> > On 09/21/2012 01:22 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> >> 2012/9/21 Stephen Warren :
> >>> On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
> This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD
> >
2012/9/22 Stephen Warren :
> On 09/21/2012 01:22 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> 2012/9/21 Stephen Warren :
>>> On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD
driver which includes driver modification to handle platform
On 09/21/2012 01:22 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2012/9/21 Stephen Warren :
>> On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>>> This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD
>>> driver which includes driver modification to handle platform data in
>>> both the cases with D
2012/9/21 Stephen Warren :
> On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD
>> driver which includes driver modification to handle platform data in
>> both the cases with DT and non-DT, Also adds the documentation for
On 09/21/2012 05:22 AM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
> This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD
> driver which includes driver modification to handle platform data in
> both the cases with DT and non-DT, Also adds the documentation for bindings.
> diff --git a/Docume
This patch adds device tree based discovery support for exynos DRM-FIMD
driver which includes driver modification to handle platform data in
both the cases with DT and non-DT, Also adds the documentation for bindings.
Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala
---
.../devicetree/bindings/drm/exynos/fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
