On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
struct cros_ec_device has a superfluous name field. We can get all the
debugging info we need from the existing ec_name and phys_name fields, so
let's take out the extra field.
Signed-off-by: Bill
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
struct cros_ec_device has a superfluous name field. We can get all the
debugging info we need from the existing ec_name and phys_name fields, so
let's take out the extra
Simon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
struct cros_ec_device has a superfluous name field. We can get all the
debugging info we need
Hi Doug,
On 17 June 2014 21:22, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
struct
Simon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 17 June 2014 21:22, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson
From: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
struct cros_ec_device has a superfluous name field. We can get all the
debugging info we need from the existing ec_name and phys_name fields, so
let's take out the extra field.
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson wfric...@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Doug
