Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent
people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as
we've had in the past.
One of the other reaons was
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2012, 06:19:39 schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-
VILLARD:
On 09:42 Wed 25 Apr , Tushar Behera wrote:
There are some helper macros (DEFINE_RES_XXX) for defining resource
structures. This patchset migrates all the earlier resource
definitions (within Samsung
On 09:38 Wed 25 Apr , Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2012, 06:19:39 schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-
VILLARD:
On 09:42 Wed 25 Apr , Tushar Behera wrote:
There are some helper macros (DEFINE_RES_XXX) for defining resource
structures. This patchset migrates all
On Wednesday 25 April 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
As far as I know legacy SoCs are allowed to keep being non-DT and I don't
see
the older Samsung SoCs (especially the S3C24XX ones) changing to DT anytime
soon, as they don't see any new development but only bug fixes
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent
people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as
we've had in the past.
One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with
On 04/25/2012 05:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent
people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as
we've had in the past.
One of the
On 09:42 Wed 25 Apr , Tushar Behera wrote:
There are some helper macros (DEFINE_RES_XXX) for defining resource
structures. This patchset migrates all the earlier resource
definitions (within Samsung specific code base) to use these macros.
In some cases, it was not possible to use
