On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:10:27PM -0400, Rich wrote:
I actually have a lot of information I can share about this since I
wrote this email.
Great!
To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
the
On 19.8.2012 13:25, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
the 846EL2].
Ok. So with an expander backplane (846EL*) with SES, sas2ircu is able to
control leds?
LOCATE
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0300, Harri Olin wrote:
On 19.8.2012 13:25, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
the 846EL2].
Ok. So with an expander backplane
I've got open discussions with both Supermicro and LSI at the moment,
and have shipped one of them a backplane and HBA to demonstrate this
since they couldn't replicate it easily in-house.
I also wouldn't claim SGPIO is disabled on any of these cards - any
of the RAID cards don't expose the
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:47:17AM -0400, Rich wrote:
I've got open discussions with both Supermicro and LSI at the moment,
and have shipped one of them a backplane and HBA to demonstrate this
since they couldn't replicate it easily in-house.
Cool! Let's hope they'll be able to fix it..
I
My short example would be something like the original message, but In
brief, pages 27-28 of SFF-8485 [tables 24-27, in section 8.4.4 GPIO
transmit registers] have what you want - I could reproduce the table
here, but that'd be convoluted to do in text. :)
With two LSI 9201-16i HBA attached,
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01:08AM -0400, Rich wrote:
My short example would be something like the original message, but In
brief, pages 27-28 of SFF-8485 [tables 24-27, in section 8.4.4 GPIO
transmit registers] have what you want - I could reproduce the table
here, but that'd be convoluted to
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:00:55PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Ankit == Ankit Jain jan...@suse.com writes:
Ankit Will these patches be merged? Or have they been superseded by
Ankit some other patchset?
Sorry, I've been out on vacation.
2 of the patches are absolutely trivial and
Pasi == Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi writes:
Pasi Btw do you know which LSI mpt2sas HBAs support T10 DIF stuff?
Pasi (using 520 or 528 bytes/sector drives with checkums).
Pasi LSI SAS2008 based? SAS2308 based?
SAS2008 and beyond. 512-byte logical blocks + 8 bytes of PI. Linux does
not support
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:18:57AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Pasi == Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi writes:
Pasi Btw do you know which LSI mpt2sas HBAs support T10 DIF stuff?
Pasi (using 520 or 528 bytes/sector drives with checkums).
Pasi LSI SAS2008 based? SAS2308 based?
SAS2008
Pasi == Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi writes:
Pasi So physically the disk is using 520 bytes/sector (and needs to
Pasi support that), but logically the HBA presents 512 bytes/sector +
Pasi PI.. is that correct?
Yep. The beauty of PI is that we can store the extra stuff without
having to deal
From: Michael Christie [micha...@cs.wisc.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:41 AM
To: John, Sony
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Kallickal, Jayamohan
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Removing the iscsi_data_pdu setting.
On Aug 13, 2012, at 5:29 AM, John Soni
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Pasi == Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi writes:
Pasi So physically the disk is using 520 bytes/sector (and needs to
Pasi support that), but logically the HBA presents 512 bytes/sector +
Pasi PI.. is that correct?
Yep. The
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 10:50 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 07/16/12 22:28, David Dillow wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 18:07 -0400, Mike Christie wrote:
Not sure about the ping code, but I think the dev loss tmo and fast io
fail related stuff should go to scsi_transport_template. We can
14 matches
Mail list logo
